create_provider

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already include destructiveHint: true. The description adds context with a warning emoji and 'Confirmar con usuario', indicating user confirmation needed. No contradictions, but behavioral disclosures beyond the annotation are minimal.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is short (three sentences) and front-loaded with the purpose. It uses a warning emoji and references, but the structure is slightly fragmented. Still, it is concise with minimal waste.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's complexity (21 parameters, 0% coverage) and the presence of an output schema, the description is incomplete. It lacks details on prerequisites, error handling, and most parameter semantics, leaving the agent under-informed.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

With 0% schema description coverage, the description should compensate. It only explains 'default_expense_type' with examples and references create_customer for others. This leaves 20 undocumented parameters without any semantic guidance.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states 'Crea un proveedor' (creates a provider), specifying the action and resource. It distinguishes from sibling tools like create_customer by referencing it for value validation, but does not explicitly differentiate from other create tools.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description advises user confirmation ('Confirmar con usuario') and directs to create_customer for valid values of certain parameters. However, it does not state when to use this tool versus alternatives or provide exclusions.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.