Skip to main content
Glama
dachivadachkoria

Claude Code Starter Kit MCP

by dachivadachkoria
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to Claude Code Starter Kit MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • SonarLint MCP Server

      nielspeter
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables real-time code analysis for JavaScript, TypeScript, and Python through Claude Desktop and other MCP clients, detecting bugs, code smells, and security vulnerabilities with automated quick fixes.
      7
      194
      4
      MIT

    • CodeSense MCP

      attaelahi
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Provides semantic code intelligence to help users search, navigate, and analyze entire codebases using plain English. It enables Claude to perform architectural overviews, bug detection, and refactor suggestions through local semantic search and keyword indexing.
      MIT

    • SecureVibes MCP

      SimonvanAs
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI-powered security scanning of codebases through conversational analysis, allowing users to assess, threat model, code review, DAST test, and generate security reports using natural language with Claude.
      MIT

    • Claude Jester MCP

      mstanton
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Transforms Claude from a code generator into a programming partner capable of testing, debugging, and optimizing code automatically through a secure execution environment.
      -
    Deploy Server
    RayrunBuild, deploy, and operate MCP servers without becoming an infrastructure team.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    C2.9/5.0

    Scored across 12 tools

    Disambiguation3/5

    There is overlap between agent tools (e.g., agent_bug_hunter, agent_code_reviewer) and command tools (e.g., command_fix_bugs, command_detailed_review) that cover similar concerns. However, descriptions differentiate detection vs. action, so some ambiguity remains.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Tools follow two consistent prefixes ('agent_' and 'command_') and use snake_case throughout. While the pattern is clear, the split between role-based and action-based naming could be more uniform.

    Tool Count5/5

    With 12 tools covering code review, bug detection, security, testing, documentation, refactoring, and monitoring, the count is well-scoped for a comprehensive code quality assistant.

    Completeness5/5

    The toolkit covers the full lifecycle of code quality: analysis (agents), fixes, tests, documentation, monitoring, and refactoring. No obvious gaps for its stated purpose.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources