Skip to main content
Glama
dabito

hledit-mcp

by dabito

Related Servers

Alternatives to hledit-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Provides hashline-based file editing using line-addressed edits and content hashes for integrity verification. It enables LLMs to perform precise file modifications while ensuring edits are rejected if the file content has changed since the last read.
      7 npm
      9
      MIT
    • F
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Provides file read, edit, and write operations with exact-match editing and hash-based consistency checks, designed for models that prefer structured schemas over patch grammars.
      3
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Provides bounded repository context and edit-grant MCP tools to coding agents such as Codex, indexing local repositories and enabling fingerprint-checked patch application.
      12
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI coding agents and hosts to enforce deterministic repository boundaries via MCP, providing structured reads, supervised edits, snapshots, audits, and recovery with machine-readable evidence.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Snapshot-based file editing for AI agents. Enables safe file edits by sending only new content against immutable, content-addressed snapshots with 3-way merging and ambiguity protection.
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.9/5.0

    Scored across 1 tool

    Disambiguation5/5

    Only one tool exists, so there is no possibility for disambiguation issues. The tool combines read, edit, and batch operations into a single call, eliminating any ambiguity.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    With a single tool, naming consistency is inherently perfect. The name 'hledit' is short, descriptive, and follows a clear verb-noun style.

    Tool Count3/5

    Having only one tool feels thin for a file editing server, even though it handles multiple operations. It is borderline appropriate but could benefit from separating concerns like read and edit into distinct tools.

    Completeness3/5

    The tool covers reading, editing, and batch-editing files, but lacks other common file operations such as creation, deletion, or listing. This leaves notable gaps for a complete file management surface.

    Maintenance

    ActivityStale
    ResponsivenessNo issues