create_prover

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations exist, and the description only says it provides a URL for a manual step. It does not disclose side effects, required privileges, or what happens after obtaining the URL, leaving significant behavioral gaps.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Single sentence is concise but lacks detail; it is appropriately short but does not fully leverage the space.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With only one parameter and no output schema, the description is incomplete. It does not explain prerequisite steps, the format of the URL, or how to proceed after creation.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% with a clear description of 'stakerFeeBips', but the description does not mention the parameter or explain its role in the manual step. No added value beyond the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states it provides a URL to create a prover contract, which gives a basic idea but uses 'Provides' vaguely. It distinguishes from sibling tools by mentioning 'manual step', but purpose could be clearer.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives, such as 'stake_to_prover' or 'run_prover'. The manual step nature is stated but not contextualized.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.