Skip to main content
Glama
czx1111

Code Audit MCP Server

by czx1111

Related Servers

Alternatives to Code Audit MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      An MCP server for AI security analysis, enabling vulnerability scanning, sensitive information leak detection, and GitHub code leak monitoring via 48 tools.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server that enables AI coding tools to scan projects for security vulnerabilities, secret leaks, and compliance issues, generating Korean-language audit reports.
      11
      9
      PolyForm Noncommercial 1.0.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      This MCP server enables security auditing for MCP configurations and AI agents, including prompt injection testing, data flow tracing, and security policy generation.
      16 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server that integrates SAST, DAST, and SCA security tools to enable AI-driven vulnerability scanning and automated security reporting. It allows AI assistants to execute and analyze results from tools like Semgrep, OWASP ZAP, and Trivy within a DevSecOps workflow.
      6
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server for AI coding agents that builds a complete code structure graph and semantic vector index, enabling fast querying of code entities, relationships, and impact analysis.
      11 npm
      10
      -

    TDQS

    B3.4/5.0

    Scored across 7 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Tools have distinct purposes overall, but some overlap exists between audit_quick_scan and audit_scan (quick subset of full scan) and between analyze_data_flow and build_call_graph (both related to code analysis). Descriptions help differentiate, but agents might occasionally misselect.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    Naming is mixed: 'audit_' prefix is used inconsistently (audit_analyze_file combines verbs), and verbs vary (analyze, audit, build, check, get). While readable, there is no strict verb_noun pattern throughout.

    Tool Count5/5

    With 7 tools, the server is well-scoped for a code audit domain. Each tool covers a necessary function without bloat, and the count is appropriate for the complexity of the domain.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool set covers major aspects of code auditing: scanning (full/quick/single file), data flow analysis, call graph, dependency checking, and exploitation guides. Minor gaps like a dedicated report listing are absent but not critical for typical workflows.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessSyncing