Skip to main content
Glama
czwziy

scholar-toolkit-mcp

by czwziy

Related Servers

Alternatives to scholar-toolkit-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A unified MCP server for academic paper discovery, citation exploration, and research intelligence workflows over multiple scientific knowledge sources.
      7
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Unified academic search MCP server that searches open literature (arXiv, bioRxiv, medRxiv, PMC), CNKI, and Web of Science, with browser-backed authentication, local paper library, and export to multiple formats.
      21
      2
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Academic paper search and retrieval MCP server integrating multiple scholarly platforms into a unified interface. Supports search, fetch, trend analysis, and literature review workflows.
      8
      65 npm
      3
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A MCP server for academic literature retrieval, aggregating multiple data sources like arXiv, Crossref, OpenAlex, PubMed, and Semantic Scholar to provide search, details, citations, trends, and recommendations.
      4
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Unified MCP server for scientific literature search and extraction, integrating databases like Scopus, OpenAlex, Semantic Scholar, and Unpaywall to enable AI agents to discover papers, track citations, and analyze content.
      27
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4.2/5.0

    Scored across 11 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool serves a clearly distinct purpose: searching, metadata retrieval, downloading, reading, local library management, and manuscript verification. Overlaps like download_by_cite_key and download_paper have different input methods (cite_key vs source+id), making them unambiguous.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern in snake_case. The harness tools share a uniform prefix, while the rest use clear action nouns (e.g., download_paper, library_search). No mixing of conventions.

    Tool Count5/5

    With 11 tools, the set is well-scoped for an academic paper toolkit covering search, retrieval, local library, and manuscript verification. Neither sparse nor bloated.

    Completeness4/5

    Core workflows (search, metadata, download, read, local library) are covered. Minor gaps include no manual paper addition, no library entry editing/deletion, and no citation export, but these are not critical for typical usage.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues