scholar-toolkit-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to scholar-toolkit-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceA unified MCP server for academic paper discovery, citation exploration, and research intelligence workflows over multiple scientific knowledge sources.71MIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceUnified academic search MCP server that searches open literature (arXiv, bioRxiv, medRxiv, PMC), CNKI, and Web of Science, with browser-backed authentication, local paper library, and export to multiple formats.212MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server for academic research combining local document search with Semantic Scholar API integration.MIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceAcademic paper search and retrieval MCP server integrating multiple scholarly platforms into a unified interface. Supports search, fetch, trend analysis, and literature review workflows.865 npm3MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA MCP server for academic literature retrieval, aggregating multiple data sources like arXiv, Crossref, OpenAlex, PubMed, and Semantic Scholar to provide search, details, citations, trends, and recommendations.4MIT
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceUnified MCP server for scientific literature search and extraction, integrating databases like Scopus, OpenAlex, Semantic Scholar, and Unpaywall to enable AI agents to discover papers, track citations, and analyze content.27MIT
TDQS
Scored across 11 tools
Each tool serves a clearly distinct purpose: searching, metadata retrieval, downloading, reading, local library management, and manuscript verification. Overlaps like download_by_cite_key and download_paper have different input methods (cite_key vs source+id), making them unambiguous.
All tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern in snake_case. The harness tools share a uniform prefix, while the rest use clear action nouns (e.g., download_paper, library_search). No mixing of conventions.
With 11 tools, the set is well-scoped for an academic paper toolkit covering search, retrieval, local library, and manuscript verification. Neither sparse nor bloated.
Core workflows (search, metadata, download, read, local library) are covered. Minor gaps include no manual paper addition, no library entry editing/deletion, and no citation export, but these are not critical for typical usage.