AfaAgent x402 API Suiteofficial
F
licenseNot graded
qualityC
maintenance43 x402-enabled API tools — DeFi, wallet security, AI/ML, developer tools, SEO. Pay-per-call USDC on Base via x402 protocol.
-
CyberWareX MCP Servers
Officialby cyberwareX
Related Servers
Alternatives to CyberWareX MCP Servers
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseBqualityAmaintenancePay-per-call AI agent APIs on Base via x402. Multiple tools across patents, law, AI, geo, weather, crypto, and more. Always growing.2018MIT
hyperd-mcpofficial
AlicenseAqualityDmaintenancePre-trade DeFi intelligence for AI agents. 20 paid x402 endpoints, USDC on Base.2341 npm1MIT- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenance19 pay-per-call APIs for AI agents via x402 USDC micropayments on Base — prediction markets (Polymarket, Kalshi), DeFi/crypto data, multi-chain on-chain reads across 5 EVM chains, live weather, and real-time web search. No API key or signup — from $0.001/call. npx -y microtap-mcp2015 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceProvides 30 pay-per-call APIs (compliance, trade, safety, web, data) for AI agents via MCP with automatic USDC payment on Base.MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityFmaintenance20 pay-per-call utility tools for AI agents via x402 USDC micropayments on Base. Screenshots, OCR, PDF, web scraping, weather, forex rates, crypto/stock prices, DNS, geocoding, translation, and more. $0.001–$0.008 per call. No API keys, no signup.1-
TDQS
A4.4/5.0
Scored across 3 tools
Disambiguation4/5
token_safety is the full-report umbrella and naturally overlaps with both honeypot_check and contract_risk, but the focused tools have clearly distinct single-purpose roles: sellability only vs. contract governance only. Descriptions make the separation actionable, though an agent might overuse token_safety when a lighter check would suffice.
Naming Consistency5/5
All three tool names use lowercase snake_case and follow a consistent target_aspect pattern: token_safety, honeypot_check, contract_risk. There is no mixed casing or style drift, and each name clearly reflects its focused purpose.
Tool Count5/5
Three tools is a well-scoped size for a token-security domain: one comprehensive vetting tool plus two dedicated focused checks. Each tool earns its place and there is no bloat or trivial filler.
Completeness4/5
The surface covers the core token-vetting workflow: full tradeability verdict, isolated honeypot detection, and contract-power/ownership risk. Minor gaps exist such as explicit liquidity-lock or approval-specific checks, but they are largely covered indirectly through the GoPlus and contract analysis layers.
Maintenance
ActivityMaintained
ResponsivenessUnresponsive