llm-context
# LLM Context
[](https://opensource.org/licenses/Apache-2.0)
[](https://pypi.org/project/llm-context/)
[](https://pepy.tech/project/llm-context)
**Context curation your coding agent does for itself.** `lc-init` installs a skill that teaches the agent to work out which files a task actually needs, write that down as a composable rule, check the rule against the codebase, and pack the result — for its own context, for a chat you paste into, or for a sub-agent it dispatches.
Getting the right context into an LLM is friction-heavy: finding and copying files by hand wastes time, too much context hits token limits, too little misses what matters, and follow-up file requests mean more manual fetching. The usual answers are to send everything, or to have a person curate by hand. A rule describes the selection once, and it is a thing an agent can author, verify and reuse — the tooling handles packing, follow-up fetches, and change tracking.
## Documentation lives in the skill
The full documentation is the **`lc-curate-context` skill**, installed into your project by `lc-init`. It is written to be read by an agent, and it is the only copy — this README is a landing page, not a manual.
| File | Contents |
| --- | --- |
| `SKILL.md` | Writing a rule; the workflow; packing for a sub-agent |
| `COMMANDS.md` | CLI and MCP reference, including output routing |
| `SYNTAX.md` | Rule file schema and every field |
| `PATTERNS.md` | Reusable rule shapes |
| `EXAMPLES.md` | Worked examples |
| `TROUBLESHOOTING.md` | Failure cases |
Find them at `.claude/skills/lc-curate-context/` after `lc-init`. In Claude Code the skill loads automatically; elsewhere, read the files directly.
## Installation
```bash
uv tool install "llm-context>=0.6.0"
cd <project-root>
lc-init # creates .llm-context/, installs the skill into .claude/skills/
```
Upgrading: `uv tool upgrade llm-context`, then any `lc-*` command refreshes the skill, rules and templates in place.
## Three ways to use it
**Your coding agent, curating for itself** — this is the primary path. After `lc-init` the agent has the `lc-curate-context` skill, so "get me focused context for the auth refactor" becomes a rule it writes and verifies without you naming files.
```bash
lc-preview -r tmp-prm-auth # what does this rule actually select?
```
`lc-preview` reports the exact file lists, the size, and — via the code graph — files defining symbols the selection uses but does not include. That last section is how the agent catches the module it forgot, before spending a turn on a wrong answer.
**A sub-agent, via a pipe** — a dispatcher writes the prompt, llm-context supplies the files.
```bash
lc-context -r tmp-prm-auth -a | claude -p 'Your task here'
```
`-r` routes output to stdout; without it `lc-context` copies to the clipboard, so a pipe or redirect gets nothing but log lines. These commands take no bare positional rule name — always `-r`. `-a` renders the pack's fetch instructions as shell commands the child runs itself, so from the repo root it can call `lc-missing` against the pack's timestamp for anything left out. See `SKILL.md` "Packing for a Sub-Agent".
**A chat, via MCP or the clipboard** — for models that aren't driving a terminal.
```jsonc
{
"mcpServers": {
"llm-context": {
"command": "uvx",
"args": ["--from", "llm-context", "lc-mcp"]
}
}
}
```
With MCP the model pulls files it wasn't given and notices ones that changed underneath it, through `lc_missing`, `lc_changed`, `lc_outlines` and `lc_preview`. Without it, `lc-select` then `lc-context` puts the pack on your clipboard to paste anywhere.
## Rules in one minute
A rule is YAML frontmatter plus optional markdown:
```yaml
---
description: "Debug API authentication"
compose:
filters: [lc/flt-no-files]
excerpters: [lc/exc-base]
also-include:
full-files: ["/src/auth/**", "/tests/auth/**"]
---
Focus on the authentication system and its tests.
```
You rarely write one by hand — the skill does, and `lc-preview` is how it checks its work. Rules compose, and are named by category: `prm-` produces a context, `flt-` controls file inclusion, `ins-` supplies guidelines, `sty-` enforces coding standards, `exc-` configures excerpting. Files you expect to edit go in `full-files`; supporting code goes in `excerpted-files`, where it is reduced to signatures and definitions. See `SYNTAX.md` and `PATTERNS.md`.
## What a generated context contains
Complete contents for full files, structural excerpts for the rest, a filtered file listing marking what is and isn't included, and a timestamp that `lc-missing` and `lc-changed` resolve against.
A pack is always partial — the listing is filtered by your `.gitignore` files and by the rule before anything is marked excluded, so files can exist that it never mentions. The header reports how many files are full, outlined and excerpted, so a consumer can check what it actually received rather than trusting the rule.
## Learn More
- [Design Philosophy](https://www.cyberchitta.cc/articles/llm-ctx-why.html) — why llm-context exists
- [Real-world Examples](https://www.cyberchitta.cc/articles/full-context-magic.html) — using full context effectively
## License
Apache License, Version 2.0. See [LICENSE](LICENSE) for details.
---
Developed in collaboration with several Claude models and Groks, using LLM Context itself to share code during development. All code is heavily human-curated by [@restlessronin](https://github.com/restlessronin).
TDQS
Scored across 4 tools
The tools have distinct purposes: lc_changed identifies modified files, lc_missing retrieves missing context, lc_outlines highlights important sections, and lc_rule_instructions provides rule creation guidance. There is minor potential overlap between lc_missing and lc_outlines in handling file content, but their specific focuses (missing vs. highlighted sections) keep them mostly separate.
All tool names follow a consistent 'lc_' prefix with descriptive suffixes (changed, missing, outlines, rule_instructions). This uniform pattern makes the tools easily identifiable as part of the same set and aligns with the server's 'llm-context' theme.
With 4 tools, the count is reasonable for a context management server, covering key operations like tracking changes, retrieving missing data, outlining content, and rule creation. It might benefit from additional tools for advanced context manipulation, but the core functionality is well-represented.
The tools cover essential context management tasks: monitoring changes, filling gaps, summarizing content, and rule setup. However, there are notable gaps, such as tools for deleting or updating context rules, managing context history, or integrating with external systems, which could limit agent workflows in more complex scenarios.