Skip to main content
Glama

pixoo_design_brief

pixoo_design_brief
Read-only

Get design guidance for LED displays: legibility, layout, palette, animation budget, and device-aware next steps. Use before creating scenes, dashboards, animations, or troubleshooting display issues.

Instructions

Return craft guidance and live device context for a design topic. Covers legibility rules, palette discipline, layout zones, animation budget, and pre-filled next-tool suggestions based on current device state. The orientation tool to run before authoring a scene, dashboard, or animation — or when troubleshooting display issues.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
topicYesDesign topic: text (styled text guidance), scene (composition + layout zones), dashboard (widgets + metrics), animation (motion budget + effects), pixel-art (bitmap + sprite guidance), troubleshooting (device + display issues).

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
errorNoPresent when the call failed. Absent on success.
topicNoThe topic that was requested.
craftGuidanceNoMarkdown-formatted craft rules: legibility floors, palette discipline, layout zones, and technique guidance specific to the topic.
deviceContextNoLive device state snapshot at the time of the request.
iconCategoriesNoBuilt-in icon names grouped by category (weather, arrows, status, media). Use names in pixoo_compose_scene icon elements.
availableThemesNoAvailable named scene themes (e.g. "midnight", "ember"). Use in background.theme or pixoo_display_text theme param.
nextToolSuggestionsNoSuggested next steps based on topic and device state.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections. Dates show when Glama detected each change.

  1. Changed6 schema fields changedv1.1.1
    • changedInput schema / $schema
      Previous value: -"http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#"New value: +"https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema"
    • addedInput schema / additionalProperties
      Added value: +false
    • changedOutput schema / $schema
      Previous value: -"http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#"New value: +"https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema"
    • addedOutput schema / anyOf
      Added value: +[
      +  {
      +    "not": {
      +      "required": [
      +        "error"
      +      ]
      +    },
      +    "required": [
      +      "topic",
      +      "craftGuidance",
      +      "deviceContext",
      +      "nextToolSuggestions",
      +      "availableThemes",
      +      "iconCategories"
      +    ]
      +  },
      +  {
      +    "required": [
      +      "error"
      +    ]
      +  }
      +]
    • addedOutput schema / properties / error
      Added value: +{
      +  "additionalProperties": {},
      +  "description": "Present when the call failed. Absent on success.",
      +  "properties": {
      +    "code": {
      +      "description": "JSON-RPC error code for this failure.",
      +      "maximum": 9007199254740991,
      +      "minimum": -9007199254740991,
      +      "type": "integer"
      +    },
      +    "data": {
      +      "additionalProperties": {},
      +      "properties": {
      +        "reason": {
      +          "description": "Machine-readable failure mode.",
      +          "type": "string"
      +        },
      +        "recovery": {
      +          "additionalProperties": {},
      +          "description": "Actionable next step for the caller.",
      +          "properties": {
      +            "hint": {
      +              "type": "string"
      +            }
      +          },
      +          "required": [
      +            "hint"
      +          ],
      +          "type": "object"
      +        },
      +        "retryable": {
      +          "description": "Whether retrying may succeed.",
      +          "type": "boolean"
      +        }
      +      },
      +      "type": "object"
      +    },
      +    "message": {
      +      "description": "Human-readable description of what went wrong.",
      +      "type": "string"
      +    }
      +  },
      +  "required": [
      +    "code",
      +    "message"
      +  ],
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
    • removedOutput schema / required
      Removed value: -[
      -  "topic",
      -  "craftGuidance",
      -  "deviceContext",
      -  "nextToolSuggestions",
      -  "availableThemes",
      -  "iconCategories"
      -]
  2. First observedv1.0.0

TDQS

A4.1/5.0
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The readOnlyHint annotation already tells agents this is a safe read-only operation, and the description adds useful context about what it returns: craft guidance, live device context, and next-tool suggestions. It does not disclose details about device unavailability or failure modes, but the annotation lowers the burden on the description.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is two sentences, front-loads the core purpose, and wastes no words. It covers scope, coverage areas, and a clear temporal use case without over-explaining.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a single-parameter tool with a full enum description, an output schema, and a readOnly annotation, the description is sufficiently complete. It tells agents what the tool does, what topics it covers, when to run it, and how it relates to downstream authoring tools.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema fully documents the only parameter, 'topic,' including an enum and per-value descriptions. The description's mention of topics like legibility rules, palette discipline, layout zones, and animation budget reinforces the enum but does not add essential meaning beyond the schema already covers.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description uses a specific verb-resource pair ('Return craft guidance and live device context for a design topic') and clearly defines the tool's role as an orientation tool rather than an authoring tool. It distinguishes itself from sibling tools by framing it as the step to run before authoring or troubleshooting.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description explicitly states when to use the tool: before authoring a scene, dashboard, or animation, and when troubleshooting display issues. It does not explicitly name alternative tools or exclusion criteria, but the guidance is clear enough to route an agent correctly.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/cyanheads/pixoo-mcp-server'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server