configurar_voip

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description must disclose side effects. It only says 'Configura' (configures) without describing what changes are made, whether it overwrites existing settings, requires prior router creation, or is reversible. This is a significant gap for a mutation tool.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is well-organized with a clear purpose statement, a parameter list, and an example. It is not overly verbose, and the key information (purpose) is front-loaded. The structure aids quick comprehension.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Covers all parameters and gives an example, but omits prerequisites (e.g., a router must already exist) and side effects. An output schema exists, so return values are defined elsewhere, but the lack of behavioral and usage context makes it incomplete for safe, correct invocation.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema has no descriptions (coverage 0%), so the description compensates well by explaining each parameter (max_telefonos, max_dn, red_voip, extensiones) and providing an example. The router parameter is not explicitly explained but is implied by the example. This adds value beyond the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb+resource: 'Configura Cisco CME (Call Manager Express) para telefonía IP en un router.' This clearly identifies the tool's function and distinguishes it from sibling tools like configurar_vlan or configurar_ruta_estatica, which handle other network features.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Provides an example call but offers no explicit guidance on when to use this tool vs. alternatives. The context implies it is for VoIP configuration, but there are no exclusions, prerequisites, or mentions of sibling tools that might be more appropriate for other scenarios.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.