project-code-intelligence
Related Servers
Alternatives to project-code-intelligence
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceHigh-performance code intelligence MCP server. Indexes codebases into a persistent knowledge graph — average repo in milliseconds. 159 languages, sub-ms queries, 99% fewer tokens. Single static binary, zero dependencies.1543,043MIT
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceLocal-first code intelligence MCP server with hybrid BM25 + ONNX vector search, symbol-level impact analysis, diff-aware PR review with risk scoring, and persistent memory tied to git state.366479MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceLocal-first code intelligence MCP server that enables coding agents to search code, inspect structure, read exact ranges, and explore Git history with explicit token budgets.23Apache 2.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceA local code-intelligence engine for AI agents that indexes repositories into a PostgreSQL-backed code graph and serves structured, token-budgeted context over MCP and HTTP, enabling targeted queries on symbols, dependencies, contracts, and impact analysis.Apache 2.0
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceLocal-first codebase context engine that parses code into a ranked dependency graph and serves it to AI tools via MCP for deep structural understanding.5151MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenancePrivate, local-first code intelligence MCP server that builds a static graph of repositories and exposes search, architecture, impact analysis, and review tools via MCP.MIT
TDQS
Scored across 8 tools
Tools are mostly distinct in purpose: status overview, individual retrieval of records/findings/flow, semantic/text search, and graph relationships. However, 'get_code_intel_record' and 'related_code_intel' both involve records, but descriptions clarify the difference.
Naming mixes patterns: 'get_code_intel_record' vs 'get_static_finding' (different ordering), 'search_code_intel_semantic' vs 'search_static_findings' (inconsistent prefix). 'code_intel_status' and 'related_code_intel' lack verb prefixes, breaking the verb_noun pattern.
With 8 tools, the count is well-scoped for a code intelligence server covering status, retrieval, search, and relationships. Neither sparse nor bloated.
Covers core needs: status, record/finding retrieval, two search modes, and graph edges. Missing explicit listing endpoints, but search can substitute. No clear dead ends for a read-only intelligence server.