No user-submitted related servers found.
Scored across 22 tools
Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: checks for typosquatting, malware, compatibility, health, vulnerabilities, etc. Even similar tools like `check_package` and `get_package_prompt` are differentiated by output format (JSON vs text) and use case.
Most tools follow a verb_noun pattern (e.g., `check_malicious`, `get_latest_version`), but a few like `package_exists` (noun_verb) and `install_command` (verb_noun but combined) deviate slightly. The pattern is mostly consistent with lowercase underscores.
With 22 tools, the server covers a wide range of dependency analysis needs. While slightly above the typical 3-15 range, each tool serves a specific, non-redundant purpose, making the count appropriate for its comprehensive scope.
The tool set covers nearly the entire lifecycle of package evaluation: existence, health, security, compat, migration, alternatives, trending, error resolution, and project audit. No obvious gaps for the intended domain.
