Skip to main content
Glama
cutlerbenjamin1-cmd

shell-0

by cutlerbenjamin1-cmd
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to shell-0

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • MCP Dev Runtime

      dolibali
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables direct local development operations such as shell commands, interactive terminals, file patches, images, and execution history through MCP tools, accessible via HTTP/stdio or a ChatGPT tunnel.
      6
      Apache 2.0

    • maic-server-fs-mcp

      maicFir
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Provides LLMs with local filesystem operations (read/write files, list directories) and command execution via MCP, enabling file management and task automation within AI clients.
      7
      17 npm
      ISC

    • Coding Tools MCP

      biaobiao2233
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Gives MCP-compatible AI clients safe, hands-on access to local codebases: file reading/search, multi-file patches, command execution, interactive sessions, Git inspection, and coordination of local agent providers such as Antigravity and OpenCode.
      18
      Apache 2.0

    • OmniCommanderMCP

      kaannsaydamm
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables full local computer control from MCP clients, including terminal commands, file system operations, application management, screen capture, and input device automation across Windows, macOS, and Linux.
      27
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A4/5.0

    Scored across 4 tools

    Disambiguation3/5

    Tools are generally distinct but have overlapping capabilities: terminal can run scripts that js_exec and python_exec handle, and fs operations can be done via terminal as well. Descriptions provide guidance, but an agent might still be uncertain about which tool to use for mixed tasks.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    Naming is inconsistent: 'fs' and 'terminal' are noun-based, while 'js_exec' and 'python_exec' follow a language+verb pattern. This mix makes the set less predictable.

    Tool Count4/5

    4 tools is appropriate for a general-purpose shell server, covering files, two scripting languages, and raw command execution. It is slightly on the lower side but not insufficient.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool surface covers the core domain of shell operations: file management, code execution, and system commands. Missing features like persistent state sharing across executors or advanced process control are minor gaps.

    Maintenance

    ActivityStale
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources