Skip to main content
Glama
curtis-d-williams

mcp-policy-guardian

by curtis-d-williams
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to mcp-policy-guardian

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • Change Trace MCP

      Canlendula
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      A local-first, model-neutral MCP server for collecting and normalizing change-scoped release evidence. It provides deterministic Git change summaries, evidence collection, and review bundles for agent review.
      7
      3 npm
      Apache 2.0

    • Obra CTO

      lilycip
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A local-first MCP server that scores your codebase's Build Readiness by reading code and running tests on your machine, outputting a diligence-grade score and risk register without uploading your source.
      5
      53 npm
      Apache 2.0

    • mcp-license-header-guardian

      curtis-d-williams
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A deterministic, read-only MCP server that enforces license headers in tracked Python files without requiring network access or repository mutations. It provides a specialized tool to verify license compliance through standardized, network-free analysis.
      1
      MIT

    • forge-repo-mcp

      cool-f
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      This MCP server enables automated maintenance and code analysis for Python/pytest repositories in isolated Docker environments. It supports read-only investigations, fix-and-verify tasks, and provides full audit trails with SQLite event history and artifact exports.
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A3.7/5.0

    Scored across 1 tool

    Disambiguation5/5

    Only one tool exists, so there is no possibility of confusion between tools.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    The single tool name 'check_repo_policy' follows a clear verb_noun pattern, consistent with itself.

    Tool Count3/5

    One tool is minimal but may be acceptable for a very narrow single-purpose server. However, given the server name 'Policy Guardian', a broader set of policy management tools would be expected.

    Completeness2/5

    The tool only checks for standard repository governance artifacts. There are no tools for applying policies, reporting, or managing exceptions, leaving significant gaps for a policy guardian server.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources