get_status

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations exist. Description implies a read operation but does not explicitly state it is read-only or disclose any side effects, data freshness, or error behavior. For a status tool, basic transparency is missing.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

One concise sentence in Russian. No superfluous words, but lacks structured breakdown of parameters or return values.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Despite having an output schema, the description omits parameter explanation and usage context. With no annotations and minimal description, the agent may struggle to use the tool correctly.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The sole parameter device_id has no description in schema (0% coverage). The tool description does not explain the parameter's meaning, valid values, or format, leaving the agent without guidance.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description lists specific status fields (security, engine, temperature, battery, GSM, GPS), clearly indicating the tool returns detailed device status. It distinguishes from siblings like get_location (location only) and set_* (mutations).

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives (e.g., get_location, set_security). Does not mention limitations or conditions.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.