Obsidian MCP Server
Related Servers
Alternatives to Obsidian MCP Server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to read, write, and manipulate notes in an Obsidian vault through the Local REST API.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to manage Obsidian notes via local REST API, supporting file CRUD, search, commands, and periodic notes.6,222 npm7Apache 2.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to search, read, and analyze Obsidian notes via the Local REST API.19 npm18ISC
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to manage Obsidian vaults via the local REST API, supporting CRUD operations, batch processing, templates, and vault analytics.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceAllows AI models to interact with Obsidian notes through the Local REST API, enabling creation, reading, updating, searching of notes, and Git-based automatic backups.6,222 npm1MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to manage and search Obsidian notes, folders, metadata, and links directly.-
TDQS
Scored across 14 tools
Most tools have clearly distinct purposes, but there is potential confusion between active-file operations (update_active_file, append_to_active_file) and general file operations (create_or_update_file, append_to_file). Descriptions clarify the distinction, but the overlap in functionality could cause an agent to select the wrong tool in some contexts.
All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern in snake_case (e.g., get_file, create_or_update_file, delete_file). The naming is uniform with no style mixing, and the verbs clearly indicate the action being performed.
With 14 tools, the server covers the core of Obsidian's note-taking functionality without becoming overwhelming. Each tool serves a distinct purpose, and the count is well within the typical range for a domain-specific MCP server.
The tool set covers CRUD operations for files, search, directory listing, command execution, and periodic notes—covering the main workflows. However, there are minor gaps: no way to read the currently active file (only update/append it), and no rename/move or folder creation operations. These are workable but not ideal.