Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to whoop-postgres-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Downloads all your Garmin health and fitness data into a local SQLite database and exposes 45 MCP tools for AI analysis, enabling assistants to query sleep, training load, HRV, and more.
      48
      149
      AGPL 3.0
    • F
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Provides a unified MCP interface to a personal health database, enabling AI agents to sync lifting workouts from Hevy, log food intake against a catalog, and run read-only SQL queries to cross-reference training and nutrition data.
      6
      1
      -
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables MCP clients to query locally computed recovery, strain, sleep, workout, and heart-rate data from a personal SQLite database, with tools for daily and sleep summaries, workout details, heart-rate buckets, schema inspection, reports, sync, and read-only SQL.
      8
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      A multi-user MCP server that exposes WHOOP fitness data (recovery, sleep, workouts, cycles, profile, body measurements) to AI clients. Each user connects their own WHOOP account via OAuth and only sees their own data, which is fetched live on every tool call.
      14 npm
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4.1/5.0

    Scored across 10 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Each tool targets a distinct data type (recovery, sleep, workouts, cycles) or action (auth, connect, sync, status), so boundaries are mostly clear. whoop_overview aggregates recovery/sleep/workouts/strain and thus overlaps with the individual read tools and whoop_baseline, but its 'one-call snapshot' description mostly disambiguates it.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    Every tool uses the same whoop_<noun> snake_case prefix with no mixing of conventions. The pattern is predictable and readable throughout.

    Tool Count5/5

    Ten tools is a well-scoped set: two auth tools, one sync, one status, one baseline, and six read tools. Each earns its place with no obvious redundancy.

    Completeness4/5

    The surface covers the full lifecycle: OAuth connect, sync, sync health, and reads across recovery, sleep, workouts, cycles, baseline, and overview. Minor gaps like token revocation/disconnect or delete operations are absent but not blocking for the read-oriented purpose.