Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to whoop-postgres-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to query a user's WHOOP recovery, sleep, HRV, strain, workouts and body measurements through 16 read-only tools, including today's status, personal baselines, sleep debt, trends and period comparisons. Runs locally, requires no data exports, and supports aggregate mode that limits responses to high-level summaries.
      4 npm
      -
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Downloads all your Garmin health and fitness data into a local SQLite database and exposes 45 MCP tools for AI analysis, enabling assistants to query sleep, training load, HRV, and more.
      48
      129 PyPI
      164
      AGPL 3.0
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to read a user's WHOOP recovery, sleep, HRV, strain, and workout history through a local, read-only server with tools for today's status, personal baselines, sleep debt, trends, and period comparisons. It supports Claude Desktop, Claude Code, Codex, and GitHub Copilot, letting users ask natural-language questions about their health data without exporting it themselves.
      4 npm
      -
    • F
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Provides a unified MCP interface to a personal health database, enabling AI agents to sync lifting workouts from Hevy, log food intake against a catalog, and run read-only SQL queries to cross-reference training and nutrition data.
      6
      1
      -

    TDQS

    A4.1/5.0

    Scored across 10 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Each tool targets a distinct data type (recovery, sleep, workouts, cycles) or action (auth, connect, sync, status), so boundaries are mostly clear. whoop_overview aggregates recovery/sleep/workouts/strain and thus overlaps with the individual read tools and whoop_baseline, but its 'one-call snapshot' description mostly disambiguates it.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    Every tool uses the same whoop_<noun> snake_case prefix with no mixing of conventions. The pattern is predictable and readable throughout.

    Tool Count5/5

    Ten tools is a well-scoped set: two auth tools, one sync, one status, one baseline, and six read tools. Each earns its place with no obvious redundancy.

    Completeness4/5

    The surface covers the full lifecycle: OAuth connect, sync, sync health, and reads across recovery, sleep, workouts, cycles, baseline, and overview. Minor gaps like token revocation/disconnect or delete operations are absent but not blocking for the read-oriented purpose.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessNo issues