Skip to main content
Glama
culstrup

Unanet GovCon ERP MCP Server

by culstrup

Related Servers

Alternatives to Unanet GovCon ERP MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables financial professionals to interact with QuickBooks Online using natural language for reports, journal entries, bills, expenses, and more.
      36
      341 npm
      14
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables natural language conflict-of-interest checks, historical relationship analysis, and contract review using Verdantas project data and Deltek records.
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to access and query ERP data—sales, invoices, payables/receivables, cash flow, inventory, suppliers, and financial records—through natural language, using an authorized session capture login.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables natural language interaction with Rize workspace data, including time entry management, AI suggestions, time analysis, team administration, and profitability reporting.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to directly query and manage Autotask PSA data through natural language, including ticket triage, time entry creation, company lookups, project management, billing review, and more.
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables advertising and marketing agencies to query and manage their agency data in natural language through the official public API, reading the complete financial module (bank accounts, payables and receivables, service invoices with withheld taxes) and extracting logged hours down to person, department and piece. It also creates and updates jobs, catalog pieces, tasks and production checklist items.
      MIT

    TDQS

    B3.1/5.0

    Scored across 15 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools are clearly distinct, such as timesheet and expense functions. However, the project-related get tools (get_projects, get_project_details, get_project_status, get_billing_status) overlap in purpose, though each targets a different aspect of a project, which could cause some initial confusion.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tools consistently follow the unanet_verb_noun pattern, using clear and predictable verbs like get, update, submit, create, approve, and generate. This uniform structure makes the tool set highly navigable.

    Tool Count5/5

    With 15 tools covering projects, timesheets, expenses, CRM, and billing, the count is well within the typical 3-15 range and each tool serves a specific purpose without bloat. The scope is appropriate for an ERP connector.

    Completeness3/5

    The tool set covers core workflows but has notable gaps: expenses only have submit (no get or approve), opportunities only have create, leads only have update, and there is no project creation or deletion. This uneven CRUD coverage means some operations are missing, though the core actions are present.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues