Skip to main content
Glama
cubicj

CubicJ MCP Search

Official
by cubicj
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Remote

Related Servers

Alternatives to CubicJ MCP Search

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • Brave Search MCP Server

      arben-adm
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Facilitates integration of Brave Search functionalities with AI assistants through the Model Context Protocol, enabling web and local searches using the Brave Search API.
      2
      15
      MIT

    • search-online-mcp

      gastonmorixe
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Exposes a standardized web search tool via Brave Search for MCP clients like Codex, Claude, and Cursor, returning stable JSON.
      MIT

    • Brave Search MCP Server

      YC-Agents-Hackathon
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables web and local business searches through the Brave Search API. Provides general web search with pagination and filtering, plus local business search with automatic fallback to web results.
      -

    • webresearcher-mcp-server

      anihilator1
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables LLM hosts to run DuckDuckGo searches, scrape JavaScript-rendered and cookie-consent-gated pages with a hardened headless browser, and launch non-blocking same-domain BFS crawls whose progress and extracted content can be polled.
      Apache 2.0

    • Brave Search MCP Server

      thomasvan
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Integrates the Brave Search API into AI assistants to enable web and local business search capabilities. This allows models to perform real-time information retrieval and locate places using the Model Context Protocol.
      1
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A4.4/5.0

    Scored across 2 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    web_search handles discovery with ranked excerpts, while fetch retrieves and extracts full content from a single URL. Their roles are clearly distinct and the descriptions reinforce when to use each.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    fetch is a bare verb and web_search is a compound noun/verb form, so there is no shared verb_noun pattern. Both are readable and common, but the conventions are mixed.

    Tool Count4/5

    Two tools cover the core search-and-retrieve workflow without redundancy, but the count is slightly below the typical 3–15 range. Each tool earns its place for the server's narrow purpose.

    Completeness4/5

    The surface covers discovery via web_search and retrieval via fetch, including pagination and many site-specific extractors. Minor gaps like batch fetching or search pagination exist, but there are no major dead ends.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources