Skip to main content
Glama
ctmx

openrouter-jev-mcp

by ctmx

Related Servers

Alternatives to openrouter-jev-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Connect AI agents to Jev AI (jev-ai.pro) for classification, scoring, yes/no checks, advisory action assessment, batched typed decisions and saved judges. Returns structured answers and probabilities using your Jev AI API key.
      6
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI coding agents to make fast, zero-output-token decisions by evaluating context, diffs, logs, or options through the OpenRouter Decisions API using TypeSafe Jev, returning calibrated probabilities for binary, categorical, or scoring questions.
      1
      32 npm
      3
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables coding or reasoning agents to request structured judgments from TypeSafe's Jev model at decision points, including choices, scores, claim verification, and code reviews, with probabilities and confidence returned as data.
      5
      9 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables coding agents to query a Jev model for next-tool recommendations, exposing tools to check status and request tool-choice predictions, while logging all decisions for review.
      12 npm
      4
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI coding agents to offload yes/no, multiple-choice, and scoring questions to TypeSafe's Jev, returning compact confidence-scored answers to save tokens and improve speed.
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables frontier coding agents to delegate routine probabilistic judgments to TypeSafe Jev, providing calibrated triage signals for failures, attempts, completion, context ranking, findings, risk, and generic evidence-grounded questions.
      7
      MIT

    TDQS

    B3/5.0

    Scored across 5 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Each tool has a distinct evaluation purpose: single check, classification, scoring, batch evaluation, and health reporting. The only mild overlap is between jev_check and jev_evaluate, since evaluate can contain Noul questions, but the singular versus map distinction keeps them separable.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    All tools share the jev_ prefix and use lowercase snake_case, creating a clear family resemblance. The main inconsistency is that four tools are verb-based (check, classify, score, evaluate) while jev_health is a noun, but the pattern remains predictable.

    Tool Count5/5

    Five tools is a well-scoped set for an evaluation-oriented server: single operations plus a batch operation plus health. Each tool has a distinct role without unnecessary redundancy.

    Completeness5/5

    The tool surface covers the core evaluation lifecycle: primitive checks, categorical classification, ordered scoring, batched evaluation of mixed question types, and health/configuration readiness. No significant dead ends or missing core operations are apparent for the stated domain.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues