codex-intercom-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to codex-intercom-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceEnables multiple coding agents (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor) to discover each other's sessions, search transcripts, ask questions, and handoff tasks through a shared MCP server.52 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables local discovery, reading, and messaging between running Codex and Claude Code sessions through MCP.227 npmMIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceMCP server for inter-agent communication. Gives multiple Claude Code sessions a shared message board, agent registry, and orchestration layer — backed by a cloud relay so agents can coordinate across machines, repos, and teams.860 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA local MCP server that connects AI coding agents (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, etc.) on the same machine via a shared message bus, enabling them to chat, delegate tasks, and collaborate privately without cloud or internet.54 npm18MIT
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceAn MCP server that lets multiple agent sessions (e.g., Claude Code, Claude Desktop) on the same machine communicate over shared channels like walkie-talkies, enabling them to exchange messages and coordinate tasks without any central broker.230 PyPI4MIT

tincanofficial
AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceEnables live Claude Code and Codex sessions on the same machine to send each other text messages directly. It provides peer discovery, message sending, and a shared message log through MCP tools.46,093 npmMIT
TDQS
Scored across 10 tools
Several tools surface overlapping views: intercom_status reports active sessions and unread messages/asks, which overlaps with intercom_list (sessions), intercom_team (coworkers), and intercom_pending (unread messages/asks). The descriptions clarify intended focus, but an agent could reasonably pick status vs list vs pending for the same need.
Every tool follows a uniform intercom_<verb/noun> snake_case convention (intercom_send, intercom_reply, intercom_set_summary, intercom_whoami). The pattern is fully predictable with no style deviations.
Ten tools is well-scoped for a session coordination/intercom server, covering identity, messaging, teams, and status without redundancy-driven bloat. Each tool corresponds to a distinct coordination action.
The surface covers the core lifecycle: join/create teams, send/ask/reply messaging, identity, status, and summaries. Minor gaps remain, such as no leave-team/leave-session operation and no message history retrieval, but agents can work around these.