Skip to main content
Glama
ctliz

codex-intercom-mcp

by ctliz

Related Servers

Alternatives to codex-intercom-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables multiple coding agents (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor) to discover each other's sessions, search transcripts, ask questions, and handoff tasks through a shared MCP server.
      5
      2 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server for inter-agent communication. Gives multiple Claude Code sessions a shared message board, agent registry, and orchestration layer — backed by a cloud relay so agents can coordinate across machines, repos, and teams.
      8
      60 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A local MCP server that connects AI coding agents (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, etc.) on the same machine via a shared message bus, enabling them to chat, delegate tasks, and collaborate privately without cloud or internet.
      54 npm
      18
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables live Claude Code and Codex sessions on the same machine to send each other text messages directly. It provides peer discovery, message sending, and a shared message log through MCP tools.
      4
      6,093 npm
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.6/5.0

    Scored across 10 tools

    Disambiguation3/5

    Several tools surface overlapping views: intercom_status reports active sessions and unread messages/asks, which overlaps with intercom_list (sessions), intercom_team (coworkers), and intercom_pending (unread messages/asks). The descriptions clarify intended focus, but an agent could reasonably pick status vs list vs pending for the same need.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    Every tool follows a uniform intercom_<verb/noun> snake_case convention (intercom_send, intercom_reply, intercom_set_summary, intercom_whoami). The pattern is fully predictable with no style deviations.

    Tool Count5/5

    Ten tools is well-scoped for a session coordination/intercom server, covering identity, messaging, teams, and status without redundancy-driven bloat. Each tool corresponds to a distinct coordination action.

    Completeness4/5

    The surface covers the core lifecycle: join/create teams, send/ask/reply messaging, identity, status, and summaries. Minor gaps remain, such as no leave-team/leave-session operation and no message history retrieval, but agents can work around these.

    Maintenance

    ActivityActive
    ResponsivenessNo issues