Skip to main content
Glama
ctjmaxwell

Anki Flashcard MCP

by ctjmaxwell

Related Servers

Alternatives to Anki Flashcard MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • F
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      This MCP server connects Claude with Anki, allowing users to create flashcards conversationally and automatically deduplicates, classifies, and uploads them without manual copying and pasting. It runs locally with Ollama for embeddings and classification, ensuring privacy.
      13
      -
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      An MCP server that enables AI assistants like Claude to interact with Anki flashcard decks, allowing users to create, manage, and update flashcards through natural language conversations.
      9
      42
      MIT
    • F
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server that enables Claude Code to create, manage, and search Anki flashcards directly from the terminal. It supports batch card creation, deck statistics retrieval, and synchronization with AnkiWeb for cross-platform review.
      8
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server that enables AI assistants to seamlessly manage Anki flashcards, decks, and templates through the AnkiConnect API. It supports intelligent querying, batch note creation, and detailed study progress analysis using natural language.
      4
      MIT

    TDQS

    C2.7/5.0

    Scored across 2 tools

    Disambiguation3/5

    The two tools are clearly distinguished by single vs. batch operation, and the descriptions explicitly state when to use each. However, there is still some ambiguity since both serve the same fundamental purpose (adding notes to a deck), and an agent might reasonably pick either for a single-note add when the batch tool would also work.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    Both tools follow a verb_noun style with 'add' as the verb, which is consistent. However, the naming is somewhat redundant ('add_anki_note' vs 'add_multiple_anki_notes') rather than a clean noun-based pattern like 'create_note' and 'create_notes', and the repetition of 'anki' in both is verbose.

    Tool Count1/5

    Only two tools exist, and they cover only the 'add' operation. For a flashcard MCP server, this is extremely thin — there are no tools to retrieve, update, delete, search, or review notes or decks. A server this narrow is difficult to justify as useful for real workflows.

    Completeness1/5

    The surface only supports adding notes. There are no get/update/delete operations for notes, no deck management, no card review/study operations, and no search capability. This is a severely incomplete surface for managing Anki flashcards and will cause agents to hit dead ends immediately after adding content.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues