opspilot_inspect_host

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries the full burden, and it does explicitly state the operation is read-only and that facts are redacted, which signals a safe inspection. However, it omits other behavioral details such as required permissions, behavior for unknown/unregistered hosts, and the exact scope of the returned facts.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, front-loaded sentence with no filler or redundancy. It conveys the essential action, target, and key qualifiers in six words.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a tool with no output schema or annotations, the description is too sparse to fully guide invocation. It does not describe what the returned facts include, how they are structured, or how this tool relates to the similar-looking 'opspilot_describe_host', leaving gaps in both selection and usage.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema has 0% description coverage and the tool description does not explicitly explain the 'host_alias' parameter or how to obtain valid values. The phrase 'one registered host' implies the alias identifies a registered host, but it does not direct the agent to use a companion listing tool or clarify input format.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool inspects one registered host and returns read-only facts, using a specific verb ('Inspect') and resource ('registered host'). However, it does not differentiate itself from the sibling tool 'opspilot_describe_host', which likely performs a similar function.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

There is no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like opspilot_list_hosts or opspilot_describe_host. It does not mention any prerequisites or which sibling tools provide complementary information.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.