read_doc_contents
Read the text content of a document by providing its ID.
Instructions
Read the contents of a document and return it as a string.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| doc_id | Yes | Id of the document to read |
Read the text content of a document by providing its ID.
Read the contents of a document and return it as a string.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| doc_id | Yes | Id of the document to read |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided, so description carries full burden. Only states basic read operation; no mention of error handling, read-only guarantee, or behavior on invalid inputs.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single sentence, no redundant information. Could be improved with additional context without harming conciseness.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given no output schema, description mentions return value as string, which is helpful. Lacks details on error conditions or edge cases, but adequate for a simple read tool.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 100% for the single parameter; description does not add additional meaning beyond the schema.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Description clearly states the action (read), resource (document), and output format (string). Distinguishes from sibling tool 'edit_document' which implies modification.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus the sibling 'edit_document'. Does not specify any prerequisites or alternatives.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/cslylla/mcp_chat_cli'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server