get_app_latest_version

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries full burden. It mentions the tool 'Get[s]' information and returns a 'Dictionary containing release information', but does not disclose behavioral traits such as whether it requires authentication, has rate limits, or how it handles errors. The description is minimal and lacks essential operational details.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is appropriately sized and front-loaded, starting with the core purpose followed by structured 'Args' and 'Returns' sections. Every sentence earns its place by providing essential information without redundancy or fluff, making it easy to scan and understand.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given no annotations, no output schema, and 3 parameters with 0% schema coverage, the description is incomplete. It covers the basic purpose and parameters but lacks details on return values (only mentions 'Dictionary' vaguely), error handling, or prerequisites. For a tool with this complexity, it should provide more context to be fully helpful.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, so the description must compensate. It adds meaning by explaining each parameter's purpose: 'app' as 'name or numeric ID', 'splunk_version' for 'compatibility with', and 'is_cloud' for 'check compatibility with Splunk Cloud'. This clarifies semantics beyond the bare schema, though it could provide more detail on formats or constraints.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool's purpose with specific verb ('Get') and resource ('latest compatible version of an app'), and distinguishes it from sibling tools like 'download_app' (which downloads) and 'search' (which searches). It specifies the context of 'for a specific Splunk version' and compatibility checking.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage by stating 'for a specific Splunk version' and 'check compatibility with Splunk Cloud', but does not explicitly say when to use this tool versus alternatives like 'download_app' or 'search'. It provides context but lacks explicit guidance on exclusions or comparisons.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.