cipher-x402-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to cipher-x402-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceMCP server exposing 10 curated tools for AI agents, providing crypto trading signals, on-chain analysis, and web utilities via pay-per-call x402 endpoints on the Base network.MIT
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceMCP server for purchasing Kronos market intelligence via x402 USDC payments on Base, providing tools for risk, whale flows, signals, history, forecasts, and auditable decision journaling.842 npm1MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceMCP server providing 50+ crypto, market intelligence, and AI inference endpoints with x402 pay-per-request micropayments on Base.1Apache 2.0
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceWallet-funded remote MCP for live Solana priority fees, transaction simulation and diagnosis, token-risk checks, PDF-to-Markdown, and audio normalization. Paid tools use x402 on Solana and Base with no API key.-
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceMCP server combining DEX Screener market data with Jupiter swap quotes and gated execution on Solana, offering read-only tools and an optional trading mode with safety caps.115 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceMCP server that provides AI agents with pay-per-call access to a suite of tools (honeypot check, token market, DeFi yields, etc.) via USDC on Base using the x402 protocol.3 npmMIT
TDQS
Scored across 15 tools
Each tool targets a completely different domain or service, from Solana wallet auditing to USDA nutrition lookup. There is no overlap in purpose, making it easy for an agent to distinguish which tool to use.
Naming patterns are inconsistent: some tools use 'verb_noun' (e.g., check_password_breach), others use 'domain_feature' (e.g., coinalyze_funding_rates), and some are descriptive phrases (e.g., get_premium_cipher_chapter). No unified pattern is followed.
15 tools is a moderate count, but the immense breadth across unrelated domains (crypto, medical, geolocation, nutrition, FDA, etc.) makes the set feel bloated and unfocused. A smaller number covering coherent areas would be more appropriate.
The server lacks a coherent domain. It offers solitary tools from many fields with no attempt at coverage completeness for any single domain. For example, it has two geocoding tools but no map or routing tools; it has multiple Solana tools but misses basic wallet operations. The set feels like a random collection rather than a planned suite.