Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to autobat-v3

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      An MCP server that enables natural-language control of AutoCAD via file IPC or headless DXF generation, with tools for drawing, entities, layers, blocks, annotations, P&ID, views, and system operations.
      8
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      MCP server for full AutoCAD automation, AutoCAD LT automation, and headless DXF generation. It provides 8 consolidated tools for drawing, entity, layer, block, annotation, P&ID, view, and system operations via MCP stdio transport.
      12
      23
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server for AutoCAD LT automation and headless DXF generation, exposing tools for drawing, entities, layers, blocks, annotations, P&ID, and view operations via natural language.
      8
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables programmatic control of AutoCAD through COM automation, allowing natural language commands to create structures, manage layers, and manipulate entities via MCP clients like Claude.
      63
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables natural-language control of AutoCAD LT for automation and headless DXF generation, supporting drawing, entity, layer, block, annotation, P&ID, and system operations via an MCP interface.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      MCP server that lets AI draw in AutoLISP-capable CAD (reference BricsCAD on Linux) via a file bridge, enabling 2D drafting, 3D solid modeling, and verification with 100 tools.
      128
      2
      Apache 2.0

    TDQS

    B3.4/5.0

    Scored across 46 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools have clearly distinct purposes, and descriptions help differentiate similar ones (e.g., read_drawing vs get_drawing_info, query_entities vs find_nested). A few pairs like list_references vs list_library could be confused, but their descriptions resolve potential misselection.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    The majority follow a consistent verb_noun pattern (list_layers, create_drawing, draw_wall, etc.), with occasional nouns like 'placement_context' and 'entities_near' standing out. Overall, the naming is predictable and readable, with only minor deviations.

    Tool Count2/5

    With 46 tools, the set is significantly larger than the typical 3-15 range, and exceeds the 25-tool threshold for 'too many.' While each tool addresses a specific need, the sheer volume makes it heavy and difficult for an agent to navigate efficiently.

    Completeness4/5

    The surface covers the core CAD workflow thoroughly: creating, opening, saving, reading, transforming, and deleting entities, plus library management and specific Azcuy operations. Minor gaps exist (e.g., no explicit close_drawing or block redefinition), but they are not blocking and can be worked around.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessSyncing