Skip to main content
Glama
crunchtools

io.github.crunchtools/airlock

Official
by crunchtools

Related Servers

Alternatives to io.github.crunchtools/airlock

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Securely fetches web content, extracts links and metadata, and downloads files through a sandboxed MCP server without JavaScript execution. Includes prompt-injection detection and comprehensive HTML sanitization for safe web data retrieval.
      2
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Safe, self-hosted MCP server for web grounding that fetches live pages through a stealth-patched Chrome and returns clean Markdown with provenance, preventing SSRF and blocks.
      4
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      An MCP server that fetches web pages and extracts clean, AI-friendly Markdown content using Mozilla Readability. It provides secure web access for LLMs with built-in SSRF protection and automated content cleaning for improved context retrieval and summarization.
      1
      42 npm
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A read-only MCP server that fetches hard-to-scrape web pages via an anti-detection browser and returns clean, token-efficient markdown. It exposes a single fetch tool that converts pages to markdown without requiring approval prompts.
      -
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Fetch URLs and return clean, LLM-ready markdown with metadata and layered prompt injection defense. Configurable timeouts, word limits, JS rendering, and link extraction. All-in-one MCP server + CLI.
      1
      1
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.5/5.0

    Scored across 17 tools

    Disambiguation2/5

    The safe_* and quarantine_* variants of fetch, read, and search are clearly differentiated, but scan_content, deep_scan_content, quarantine_scan, and deep_quarantine_scan have overlapping purposes (security scans on content with different layers). Additionally, safe_content and quarantine_content both sanitize inline content, differing mainly in whether they warn or fail on injection, which may cause misselection.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    The tools follow a loose pattern with prefixes like safe_, quarantine_, scan_, but the mix includes verbs like reconnect, flush, reload alongside noun-based names. Some tools use the verb 'scan' as a base (scan_content, deep_scan_content) while others use 'quarantine_scan' and 'deep_quarantine_scan', creating inconsistency in how scan variants are named. Overall, the pattern is not uniform.

    Tool Count3/5

    With 17 tools, this server is on the higher end of the typical range (3-15), and while each tool has a specific function, the number feels heavy, especially given the many near-duplicates like safe_fetch, quarantine_fetch, safe_search, quarantine_search, and the four scan variants. The count is borderline appropriate but could be streamlined.

    Completeness3/5

    The tool surface covers a range of security operations including fetching, reading, searching, scanning, and configuration management. However, there is no tool for updating or removing backends directly (only reconnect and cache_flush), and no tool for managing blocklists or whitelists explicitly. The completeness is moderate, with some operational gaps.

    Maintenance

    ActivityActive
    ResponsivenessResponsive