pod_start_tool

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden of behavioral disclosure. It clearly states the primary effect (starting the pod and all its containers) but does not disclose additional behaviors like idempotency, error handling, or whether the command blocks until containers are running. This is a minimal but acceptable disclosure for a straightforward start operation.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, concise sentence that conveys all essential information without any wasted words. It is well-structured and immediately understandable.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple tool with one parameter and an existing output schema, the description is minimally sufficient. However, it lacks any nuance about when a pod can be started (e.g., must be created first) or interactions with related tools. Given the availability of sibling tools and the absence of annotations, a more complete description would enhance usability, but the current text covers the core function.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema has 100% coverage, with the parameter 'name' described as 'Pod name or ID'. The description adds no extra semantic meaning beyond the schema. Given the high schema coverage, a baseline score of 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description 'Start a pod and all its containers' clearly specifies the verb (start), the resource (pod), and the scope (all containers). It effectively distinguishes from sibling tools like container_start_tool, which targets individual containers, and pod_stop_tool, which performs the opposite action.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies when to use this tool (when you want to start an entire pod with all its containers) but does not explicitly mention alternatives or exclusion criteria. There is no direct comparison to container_start_tool or any guidance on prerequisites, such as the pod already existing.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.