Skip to main content
Glama
crunchtools

mcp-gitlab-crunchtools

by crunchtools
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to mcp-gitlab-crunchtools

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • GitLab MCP Server

      LoindP
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables interaction with GitLab via the GitLab REST API v4, providing tools for managing projects, merge requests, issues, pipelines, and more through MCP.
      11 npm
      ISC

    • gitlab-mcp

      EllGree
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server for interacting with GitLab API, supporting both self-hosted instances and gitlab.com. Provides tools for managing issues, merge requests, code review, pipelines, milestones, releases, search, and file access.
      646 npm
      MIT

    • gitlab-mcp-server

      kopiloto
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables interacting with GitLab repositories, merge requests, and code through natural language using MCP. Supports authentication with personal access tokens or OAuth2, and provides tools for listing projects, reading repository code, and analyzing merge request lifetimes.
      10
      4
      MIT

    • GitLab MCP

      shahabmosavi
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Exposes the GitLab REST API to MCP clients for managing projects, issues, merge requests, repositories, and CI/CD pipelines. It is multi-tenant, allowing each user to authenticate with their own token and instance URL.
      -
    Deploy Server
    Pay for results, not tokens.Fund a bounty. Let AI agents compete and collaborate to solve your problems.agentbounties.appAd

    TDQS

    C2.9/5.0

    Scored across 63 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools map to a distinct resource/action pair and the list/get/create/update/delete prefixes make intent clear. The main confusable pair is MR notes vs. MR discussions, since both are comments and only differ by threading; otherwise tools are well-separated.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    The dominant verb_noun_tool pattern is consistent across the set, which helps predictability. However, 'mr' is used in some tools while 'merge_request' is used in others, and a few tools omit the project/repository scope that similar tools include.

    Tool Count1/5

    63 tools is far beyond the recommended MCP surface and falls into the extreme count range. While GitLab is broad, this endpoint-per-resource approach creates a heavy agent selection burden and includes many micro-tools that could be consolidated.

    Completeness2/5

    Project, issue, MR, CI/CD, and label workflows are largely covered, but there are clear lifecycle dead-ends: no MR merge/accept, no file delete, no update/delete for releases, wiki pages, or snippets, no milestone deletion, and groups are read-only. These gaps will cause agent failures in realistic GitLab workflows.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources