Skip to main content
Glama
Sign In
crunchtools

MCP GitHub CrunchTools

by crunchtools
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Remote

Related Servers

Alternatives to MCP GitHub CrunchTools

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • mcp-github

      nhevers
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server for GitHub operations, providing tools for repository management, issues, pull requests, and code search.
      -

    • GitHub Prod MCP

      nouhailadahmany
      A
      license
      C
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A production-ready MCP server for GitHub operations, providing tools for repository management, issues, pull requests, and more via both MCP stdio and REST API.
      27
      MIT

    • Gooseworks MCP

      EduardKuun
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A Model Context Protocol (MCP) server that exposes GitHub tools for repository management, code search, issue creation, and pull request operations.
      1
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    Shareable, User-Owned Context BackendPeople, applications, and agents read, write, and coordinate together in one context lake. Reach it over MCP, a CLI, a Python SDK, or REST.fulcradynamics.comAd

    TDQS

    B3.4/5.0

    Scored across 26 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools have clearly distinct resource/action targets, and the descriptions specifically clarify tricky adjacent cases such as issue comments versus pull request comments and workflow rerun variants. The main mild overlap is around comment handling across issues and pull requests, but it is not severe enough to cause frequent misselection.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    Tool names consistently use snake_case verb_noun phrasing with a uniform _tool suffix, such as list_issues_tool, create_pull_request_tool, and get_failed_job_logs_tool. The pattern is predictable throughout the entire set.

    Tool Count3/5

    At 26 tools this server is heavy for a single MCP surface and sits at the upper boundary of what is comfortably scannable. The breadth of GitHub operations explains many of the tools, but the set could still benefit from grouping or trimming.

    Completeness3/5

    Core issue, pull request, Actions, repository search, and file-reading workflows are covered. However, notable gaps remain around PR review creation/approval, release listing or updates, and branch/commit operations, so agents may hit dead ends in common GitHub workflows.

    Maintenance

    ActivityActive
    ResponsivenessUnresponsive

    Resources