Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to MCP Teamtailor

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A server implementation that enables interaction with Greenhouse's recruitment and applicant tracking system through Model Context Protocol, providing tools for job listings, candidate management, application filtering, and stage transitions.
      1
      -
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Full-coverage, read-only MCP server for the Teamtailor recruitment API. Exposes 18 tools covering candidates, jobs, applications, offers, stages, departments, locations, users, and activities with strict input validation.
      -
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Model Context Protocol (MCP) server for the Crelate ATS/CRM API, enabling Claude Code and other MCP clients to interact with Crelate recruiting and staffing workflows.
      42
      2
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A server implementing the Model Context Protocol that enables users to retrieve LinkedIn profile information and activity data via EnrichB2B API, and generate text using OpenAI GPT-4 or Anthropic Claude models.
      1
      -
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A Model Context Protocol server that provides a standardized interface for interacting with the Tinder API, handling authentication, request processing, rate limiting, caching, and error handling.
      25
      -

    TDQS

    C2.8/5.0

    Scored across 2 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    The two tools have clearly distinct purposes: one retrieves a single candidate by ID, the other lists and filters candidates. There is no ambiguity.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    Both tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern with the prefix 'teamtailor_', making them predictable and easy to understand.

    Tool Count3/5

    With only 2 tools, the set feels thin for a typical ATS domain. While basic get and list are covered, a richer set (e.g., create, update, delete) is expected, making the count borderline.

    Completeness2/5

    The tool surface is severely incomplete for candidate management: it lacks create, update, delete operations, and other common entities like jobs or applications are missing.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues