Skip to main content
Glama
cronty-com

Cronty MCP

Official
by cronty-com

Related Servers

Alternatives to Cronty MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server for managing structured reminders for AI agents, with persistent storage, full-text search, and cross-session support.
      44 npm
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      F
      maintenance
      MCP server that allows AI coding assistants to schedule deferred tasks such as reminders, shell commands, and AI prompts, executing them as an OS daemon.
      5 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A hosted remote MCP server that lets your AI agent schedule tasks for later — reminders, delayed webhook callbacks, and recurring jobs. Read-only by design.
      0
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A local MCP server for task management with deadlines, enabling AI assistants to add, update, complete, and snooze tasks. It integrates with a desktop sticky note and ntfy push notifications for reminders.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      An MCP server that lets LLM agents dispatch native OS notifications when a task finishes. It supports cross-platform desktop notifications, task tokens for updates, mobile bridges, and quiet hours.
      2
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A streamlined MCP server that enables AI assistants to send real-time notifications to your devices through the ntfy service, allowing you to receive alerts when tasks complete or important events occur.
      2
      165 npm
      74
      GPL 3.0

    TDQS

    A3.8/5.0

    Scored across 8 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: scheduling (recurring vs one-off), immediate push, time retrieval, and lifecycle management (delete, pause, resume, list). There is no ambiguity between tools.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern with snake_case (e.g., delete_schedule, get_current_time, send_push_notification). The naming is predictable and easy to understand.

    Tool Count5/5

    8 tools cover the core functionality of a notification scheduling server. The number feels well-scoped—not too few to miss essential operations, not too many to overwhelm.

    Completeness3/5

    Recurring schedule management is complete (create, list, pause, resume, delete), but there is no update tool and no way to view or cancel one-off scheduled notifications. This leaves notable gaps in the lifecycle.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues