Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to qt-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server for inspecting, debugging, and interacting with PySide6 desktop applications. It enables AI agents to capture UI snapshots, read widget properties, and perform actions like clicking buttons or typing text.
      22
      2
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server for capturing screenshots of desktop windows on Windows. Allows AI assistants to see what's on screen for UI development, debugging, and iterating on designs.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      MCP server for automating and introspecting native Qt applications (QWidget and QML) without source changes. Enables AI agents to control running Qt apps through UI snapshots, element lookup, and real input simulation.
      25
      2
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      An MCP server for headless Qt/PySide6 GUI testing that enables AI assistants to launch desktop applications via Xvfb and perform visual verification. It supports widget discovery, screenshot capture, and simulated user interactions like clicks, typing, and keyboard shortcuts.
      8
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.8/5.0

    Scored across 15 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: file operations (move, create_directory, read_file, write_file, etc.) are separate from screen capture tools (list_windows, capture_window, capture_region) and Qt widget tools (capture_widget, list_capturable_widgets, attach_status). There is no overlap or ambiguity between tools.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Most tool names follow a verb_noun pattern (e.g., create_directory, list_windows, read_file). However, a few deviate: 'delete' is a single verb, and 'file_info' is noun_noun. Overall the pattern is mostly consistent and intuitive.

    Tool Count4/5

    15 tools is slightly above the typical range but still well-scoped for the server's three domains (file management, screen capture, Qt widget capture). The count is justified and not excessive.

    Completeness4/5

    File operations cover create, read, update, delete, list, search, and move—nearly complete lifecycle. Screen capture tools provide listing and capture. Qt widget tools offer listing and capture but lack interaction beyond capture, which is acceptable given the server's focus.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessNo issues