F
licenseNot graded
qualityD
maintenanceMulti-Agent Conversation Protocol server that enables interaction with Asana's task management API, allowing users to manage projects, tasks, and team collaboration through natural language.
-
MCP Server for Asana
by cristip73
Related Servers
Alternatives to MCP Server for Asana
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA Type 4 OAuth MCP server for the Asana API, enabling AI assistants to manage workspaces, projects, tasks, comments, users, and teams.-
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP (Multi-Agent Conversation Protocol) server that enables interacting with the Asana API through natural language commands for task management, project organization, and team collaboration.-
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol (MCP) server that provides comprehensive Asana integration, enabling AI assistants like Claude to interact with Asana workspaces, projects, tasks, goals, portfolios, and more.-
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP (Multi-Agent Conversation Protocol) Server that enables interaction with the Asana API, auto-generated using AG2's MCP builder.-
- AlicenseBqualityCmaintenanceMCP server for the Asana API that allows AI agents to read and optionally write to Asana tasks, comments, and custom fields, with tiered access controls and no delete tools.819 npmMIT
TDQS
B3.2/5.0
Scored across 41 tools
Disambiguation4/5
Most tools have distinct purposes targeting specific Asana resources and actions, such as 'asana_create_task' vs. 'asana_update_task' or 'asana_get_project' vs. 'asana_search_projects'. However, there is some potential overlap between 'asana_get_tasks_for_project' and 'asana_get_project_hierarchy' (which includes tasks), and between 'asana_get_project_status' and 'asana_get_project_statuses', which could cause minor confusion in selection.
Naming Consistency5/5
All tools follow a consistent 'asana_verb_noun' pattern with snake_case throughout, such as 'asana_create_project', 'asana_get_task', and 'asana_update_task'. The naming is predictable and uniform, making it easy for agents to understand and use the toolset without ambiguity in formatting.
Tool Count2/5
With 41 tools, the count is excessive for a typical MCP server, making it heavy and potentially overwhelming for agents to navigate. While Asana's API is feature-rich, this many tools suggests over-fragmentation of operations that could have been consolidated, such as separate tools for adding followers to projects vs. tasks, which might be better handled with parameters.
Completeness5/5
The toolset provides comprehensive coverage of Asana's core functionalities, including CRUD operations for tasks, projects, sections, and attachments, as well as advanced features like dependencies, stories, statuses, and searches. There are no obvious gaps; agents can perform full lifecycle management and complex workflows without dead ends.
Maintenance
ActivityInactive
ResponsivenessNo issues