Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to mcp-genoffice

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      MCP server for Office documents — create, edit, fill templates, convert, and extract Word/Excel/PowerPoint. LaTeX-style markup, math formulas, PDF export, template loops, and document diff. stdio / SSE / Streamable HTTP with auth and rate limiting.
      12
      21 PyPI
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      An MCP server for reading, editing, and validating Microsoft Word documents with specialized support for track changes, comments, and footnotes. It enables structural auditing, heading extraction, and precise OOXML-level document manipulation through natural language tools.
      100
      418 PyPI
      57
      MIT
    • A
      license
      C
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A unified MCP server for document processing that enables creating, editing, and converting Word documents (DOCX), PDFs, Markdown, and images, with support for templates, formatting, and batch operations.
      100
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Suite of MCP servers for local-first, governed automation of Microsoft Office files (Excel, PowerPoint, Word) via structured tool calls.
      73 PyPI
      9
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4.1/5.0

    Scored across 15 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    The file-based tools (docx/pptx) are clearly separated by format and operation (create/patch/delete/blocks/slides), and the app-control tools are distinct from file tools. There is minor potential confusion between genoffice_docx_patch and genoffice_docx_delete, and between genoffice_extract_text and genoffice_docx_blocks (both read content), but descriptions are detailed enough to disambiguate.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tools follow a consistent genoffice_<domain>_<verb> pattern, with domains (docx, pptx, app) and verbs (create, patch, delete, status, launch) applied consistently. No camelCase mixing or irregular verb styles. The pattern is highly predictable.

    Tool Count4/5

    15 tools is at the upper boundary of the well-scoped range but reasonable given the server covers both file manipulation (8 tools) and app control (5 tools) plus shared extraction. Each tool earns its place for distinct operations.

    Completeness4/5

    The server provides solid lifecycle coverage for docx and pptx (create, read, patch, delete) plus extract_text for cross-format reading and app control tools. Minor gaps include no xlsx-specific editing tools despite xlsx being mentioned in extraction, no pptx slide reordering, and no docx block insertion (only rewrite/delete).

    Maintenance

    ActivityStale
    ResponsivenessNo issues