Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to ultra-confluence-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • F
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A Model Context Protocol server that reduces token consumption by efficiently caching data between language model interactions, automatically storing and retrieving information to minimize redundant token usage.
      4
      25
      -
    • F
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A Model Context Protocol (MCP) server that optimizes token usage by caching data during language model interactions, compatible with any language model and MCP client.
      4
      2
      -
    • -
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      Not graded
      maintenance
      A Model Context Protocol server that enables interaction with Atlassian products (Confluence and Jira), supporting both Cloud and Server/Data Center deployments for searching, creating, and managing content through natural language.
      -

    TDQS

    A3.6/5.0

    Scored across 63 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a distinct Confluence resource and action, with highly detailed descriptions that clearly differentiate similar tools (e.g., multiple page-getters by space, label, or general filter). No overlap is apparent.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tools follow the consistent pattern 'confluence_verb_noun', with verbs like get, create, update, delete, add, remove, search. Exceptions like 'create_page_from_markdown_legacy' are clearly suffixed for legacy variants, maintaining a predictable structure.

    Tool Count2/5

    At 63 tools, the set is significantly oversized for typical MCP usage. While each tool may serve a purpose, the sheer volume makes navigation and selection difficult for an agent, exceeding the recommended 3-15 range.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool surface covers the vast majority of Confluence operations: pages, blog posts, spaces, comments, labels, attachments, versions, properties, search, users, and server info. Minor gaps exist (e.g., no explicit tool to create inline comments), but core workflows are well-covered.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues