wasabi
Related Servers
Alternatives to wasabi
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceLets an AI agent work on a real Commodore Amiga over the home network: AmigaDOS Shell, files, ARexx, screenshots, mouse and keyboard, and windows, gadgets and menus by name. Includes a remote desktop to watch and take over, tuned for 68000 machines and slow links.9MIT
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables an AI agent to drive a remote Linux machine over the LAN through a single TCP connection, exposing tools for shell commands, jobs, interactive PTYs, file read/write/search/transfer, process and service management, networking, packages, and power control, with optional multi-host switching. Operates without SSH or any Linux-side installation beyond one stdlib-only Python daemon, using a state-free binary protocol.MIT
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI agents to interact with Classic Mac OS 7-9 through structured commands and responses using a shared folder transport, supporting file browsing, window management, mouse/keyboard control, and more.2341 npm28GPL 3.0
- AlicenseBqualityAmaintenanceThis server enables AI agents to operate Windows and Linux computers by observing the screen, understanding the UI through accessibility, OCR, and vision, and performing mouse, keyboard, window, clipboard, and system actions with verification and recovery.292MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceAn MCP server that gives any AI assistant eyes and hands on your desktop — screenshots, clicking, typing, OCR, window management, accessibility-tree queries, workflow recording.5Apache 2.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI models to control a local Windows desktop by moving the cursor, clicking, scrolling, typing Unicode text, sending key chords, and capturing screenshots. Runs natively on Windows with minimal latency and no heavy dependencies such as Python, PyAutoGUI, or Docker.90 npm1MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI agents to securely control a remote Windows/Linux PC via MCP and REST, executing shell commands and driving coding-agent CLIs like Claude, Cursor, and Codex.1-
TDQS
Scored across 30 tools
Tools are mostly well separated by resource and action, with descriptions that explicitly cross-reference alternatives such as amiga_ui_click vs amiga_mouse, amiga_key_type vs amiga_key_press, and amiga_drag vs amiga_input. However, the GUI/input and ARexx families contain several adjacent tools that require careful reading to select correctly.
All tool names use a consistent amiga_ snake_case namespace and are grouped predictably by domain, e.g. amiga_ui_*, amiga_key_*, amiga_arexx_*. The only minor deviation is that many read-only discovery tools are noun phrases (amiga_info, amiga_screens, amiga_ps) while action tools are verbs, so it is not a pure verb_noun scheme.
30 tools is a heavy surface for an MCP server, and several could plausibly be consolidated, such as pointer/mouse, region_changed/screenshot, and slots/ps. The domain is genuinely broad, so most tools earn a place, but the count is above the comfortable range.
The surface covers a wide range of Amiga remote-control workflows: filesystem reads/writes, screen and UI automation, input, processes, ARexx, health, and Zenix console access. Minor gaps remain around explicit file lifecycle operations like delete, move, and mkdir, though amiga_run can usually compensate.