Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to MCP Ethers Wallet

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • -
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      Not graded
      maintenance
      Comprehensive Model Context Protocol server that enables AI agents to interact with 30+ Ethereum-compatible blockchain networks, supporting token transfers, smart contract interactions, and ENS name resolution through a unified interface.
      1
      -
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A Model Context Protocol server that enables AI agents to interact with 30+ Ethereum-compatible blockchain networks, providing services like token transfers, contract interactions, and ENS resolution through a unified interface.
      28
      115 npm
      379
      MIT
    • F
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      A server that exposes blockchain data (balances, tokens, NFTs, contract metadata) via the Model Context Protocol, enabling AI agents and tools to access and analyze blockchain information contextually.
      18
      46
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server that bridges AI models with Ethereum blockchains via all JSON-RPC calls, enabling natural language queries for block numbers, balances, transactions, and smart contract data.
      6 npm
      21
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A Model Context Protocol server providing Ethereum blockchain tools, including vanity address generation and Cast command functionality for interacting with Ethereum networks through natural language.
      14
      9 npm
      MIT

    TDQS

    D1.7/5.0

    Scored across 54 tools

    Disambiguation2/5

    There is significant overlap and ambiguity among tools, such as multiple ERC20 balance tools (erc20_balanceOf, getERC20Balance) and ERC721 token URI tools (erc721_tokenURI, getNFTTokenURI), which could confuse agents. Some tools like listPrompts appear unrelated to the Ethereum wallet domain, adding to the confusion.

    Naming Consistency2/5

    Naming conventions are inconsistent, mixing snake_case (e.g., erc20_balanceOf) and camelCase (e.g., getERC20Balance) without a clear pattern. Verb styles vary (e.g., 'get' vs. 'prepare' vs. 'send'), and some tools lack descriptive names (e.g., contractCall, ethSign), making the set chaotic.

    Tool Count1/5

    With 54 tools, the count is excessive for an Ethereum wallet server, leading to bloat and potential confusion. This many tools suggests poor scoping, as many functions could be consolidated (e.g., multiple ERC20/ERC721 tools), making it overwhelming for agents to navigate.

    Completeness3/5

    The toolset covers core Ethereum operations like balances, transfers, approvals, and transaction handling across ERC20, ERC721, and ERC1155 standards, but there are gaps such as missing descriptions for many tools (e.g., approveNFT, getBlockDetails) and unclear coverage for advanced features like smart contract deployment or event listening.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues