submit_comprehensive_report

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description must disclose behavioral traits. It only provides cryptic requirement and property lines without explaining side effects, authentication needs, rate limits, or what the report submission entails. The agent has no clue about safety or mutation.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely short but fails to convey necessary information. The front-loaded metadata (@requirement, Properties) is unclear and not self-explanatory. Conciseness here sacrifices utility.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The tool has 4 parameters and an output schema, but the description ignores all context. No explanation of what the report job does, how parameters affect it, or what the output looks like. Totally inadequate for a complex tool.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, and the description adds zero parameter information. Parameters like depth, payment_proof, include_predictions are unexplained, leaving the agent to guess their meanings and formats.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description 'Submit Comprehensive Report job' is vague. The requirement lines hint at a full market analysis report requiring payment, but it doesn't clearly distinguish this from sibling tools like submit_prediction_job. The verb 'submit' suggests job creation, but the specific report type is undefined.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. Sibling tools include other submit jobs (arbitrage, oracle, prediction), but no criteria for choosing this comprehensive report are provided.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.