Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to Basecamp MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables LLMs to interact with Basecamp projects, managing messages, todos, comments, people, and kanban boards through natural language. Supports comprehensive Basecamp operations including creating, reading, updating content with flexible output formats and URL parsing capabilities.
      47
      75 npm
      3
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Connects AI assistants to the Basecamp 2 API, enabling management of projects, todos, messages, and people directly through natural language.
      17
      13 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Connects Basecamp workspaces to AI tools, enabling management of projects, messages, todos, and schedules through natural language interactions. Features persistent caching and supports both reading workspace data and performing actions like creating messages and updating todos.
      10
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      F
      maintenance
      Enables seamless integration with Basecamp 3 through 46 comprehensive API tools, allowing users to manage projects, todos, card tables, documents, campfire messages, and other Basecamp features through natural language interactions in Claude Desktop and Cursor IDE.
      33
      5
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to interact with Basecamp projects, messages, to-dos, and Card Tables, with read-only access by default and write operations requiring explicit approval.
      MIT

    TDQS

    B3/5.0

    Scored across 6 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    The tools are mostly distinct, with clear separation between to-do, message, and project operations. However, 'get_todoset' and 'list_todolists' could be slightly confusing as both relate to to-do lists, though 'get_todoset' focuses on resolving the set while 'list_todolists' lists the lists within it, which helps mitigate overlap.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern (e.g., create_todo, get_message, list_projects), using snake_case throughout. This predictability makes it easy for agents to understand and navigate the tool set without confusion.

    Tool Count4/5

    With 6 tools, the count is reasonable for a Basecamp server, covering core operations like creating to-dos and listing projects. It's slightly lean but well-scoped, though it could benefit from additional tools for updates or deletions to enhance completeness.

    Completeness3/5

    The tools cover basic read and create operations for to-dos, messages, and projects, but there are notable gaps. For example, there are no update or delete tools for to-dos or messages, and operations like creating messages or projects are missing, which could limit agent workflows in a CRUD context.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues