ai-discuss
Allows using any OpenAI-compatible API as a debate participant in multi-agent discussions.
Click on "Deploy Server".
Wait a few minutes for the server to deploy. Once ready, it will show a "Started" state.
In the chat, type
@followed by the MCP server name and your instructions, e.g., "@ai-discuss debate best order execution strategy for momentum bot"
That's it! The server will respond to your query, and you can continue using it as needed.
Here is a step-by-step guide with screenshots.
ai-discuss MCP server
An MCP server that lets a host AI agent
(Claude Code, opencode, or Codex) trigger a multi-agent debate. The host
calls the discuss tool with a topic + code context; the server fans the
question out to several configured AI models, runs an N-round debate where the
agents critique and refine each other's answers, then a synthesizer produces a
consensus recommendation with ranked, scored options — and returns it so the
host can keep coding.
Models are reached through OpenAI-compatible providers — use OpenRouter (cloud: Claude, GPT, Gemini, DeepSeek, …), Ollama (local, keyless), or both at once in the same debate.
How it works
Claude Code / opencode / Codex ──MCP stdio──► ai-discuss
│ round loop (fan-out, timeouts, error isolation)
┌──────────────────────┼───────────────────┐
▼ ▼ ▼
OpenAICompatAdapter OpenAICompatAdapter Synthesizer
(OpenRouter / cloud) (Ollama / local) (a chosen participant)
│ │ │
└───────────────────────┴───► full markdown transcript on diskRound 1: each participant answers independently.
Rounds 2..N: each participant sees the others' previous answers (anonymized by default) and critiques / refines.
Synthesis: the synthesizer scores each option 0–100 and ranks them, with reasoning, consensus, and unresolved disagreements.
Output is returned three ways: a concise summary for the host agent, a
structuredContent object, and a complete markdown transcript written to disk.
Related MCP server: DebateTalk MCP
Install & build
npm install
npm run buildConfigure participants
Copy the example config and edit it:
cp ai-discuss.config.example.json ai-discuss.config.jsonThe config has a providers map (OpenAI-compatible endpoints) and a list of
participants that each pick a provider + model:
{
"providers": {
"openrouter": { "baseURL": "https://openrouter.ai/api/v1", "apiKeyEnv": "OPENROUTER_API_KEY" },
"ollama": { "baseURL": "http://localhost:11434/v1", "apiKeyEnv": null }
},
"participants": [
{ "id": "claude", "provider": "openrouter", "model": "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4" },
{ "id": "qwen-local", "provider": "ollama", "model": "qwen3.6" },
{ "id": "mock", "type": "mock", "enabled": false }
]
}participant | how it connects | key fields |
model | an OpenAI-compatible provider (default |
|
| deterministic echo — for credit-free testing |
|
API keys are never stored in config — a provider's
apiKeyEnvnames the env var that holds the key.apiKeyEnv: nullmarks a keyless provider (e.g. local Ollama).An enabled participant whose provider needs a key that isn't set is skipped at runtime — it never crashes the run.
Add or swap a discussant by editing its
model(see model ids via thelist_modelstool, openrouter.ai/models, orollama list).
Top-level options: defaultRounds, defaultSynthesizer, transcriptDir,
perParticipantTimeoutMs, maxConcurrency, anonymizePeers, apiRetries.
Register with a host
The server is a standard stdio MCP server, so it works with any MCP host. Build
first (npm run build), then register. Set OPENROUTER_API_KEY if you use
OpenRouter; for Ollama just have ollama serve running (no key).
Claude Code — .mcp.json in the project, or:
claude mcp add ai-discuss --env OPENROUTER_API_KEY=sk-or-... \
-- node /absolute/path/to/Ai-discuss-mcp/dist/index.jsopencode — opencode.json:
{
"mcp": {
"ai-discuss": {
"type": "local",
"command": ["node", "/absolute/path/to/Ai-discuss-mcp/dist/index.js"],
"enabled": true,
"environment": { "OPENROUTER_API_KEY": "sk-or-..." }
}
}
}Codex — ~/.codex/config.toml:
[mcp_servers.ai-discuss]
command = "node"
args = ["/absolute/path/to/Ai-discuss-mcp/dist/index.js"]
env = { OPENROUTER_API_KEY = "sk-or-..." }Tools
discuss
field | type | notes |
| string | required — the question/decision to debate |
| string? | code, constraints, background |
| string[]? | candidate approaches to rank (else participants propose their own) |
| number? | 1–6, defaults to config |
| string[]? | filter to these ids, defaults to all enabled |
| string? | participant id for synthesis, defaults to config |
| boolean? | default |
Returns recommendation, rankedOptions[{option, score, reasoning, risks}],
consensus, disagreements, participantsUsed, participantsFailed, rounds,
synthesizerId, degraded, and transcriptPath.
list_participants
Lists configured participants (id, provider, model, enabled/available, default
synthesizer). Cheap — reads config only, no model calls. Useful before calling
discuss.
list_models
Queries each configured provider for the model ids it can serve (OpenRouter
/models, Ollama /api/tags). Useful to discover valid model names. Optional
provider arg narrows to one provider.
Example
Claude Code, after scaffolding a trading bot, calls:
{
"name": "discuss",
"arguments": {
"topic": "Choose an order-execution strategy for a momentum intraday stock bot to minimize slippage on mid-cap tickers.",
"context": "Python bot, Alpaca API, ~50 trades/day, $5k-$20k positions, currently naive market orders.",
"options": ["Market orders", "Marketable limit orders (5bps cap)", "TWAP over 60s", "Adaptive VWAP slices"],
"rounds": 3,
"synthesizer": "claude"
}
}The server returns a ranked recommendation and a transcript path, and the host continues editing the execution module.
Development
npm run dev # tsx watch (no rebuild loop)
npm test # vitest unit suite (no network / no credits)
npm run inspect # MCP Inspector against the built server
npm run typecheck # tsc --noEmitCredit-free end-to-end
Set every participant (including the synthesizer) to type: "mock" and run the
server through npm run inspect or any MCP client. The full pipeline runs,
writes a transcript, and returns valid structuredContent without any API
calls. (With mock participants the synthesizer can't emit JSON, so you'll see
degraded: true — that exercises the fallback path.)
Design notes
Adapter pattern — the orchestrator only ever calls
participant.ask(); it never knows whether a participant is a real model or a mock. OneOpenAICompatAdapterserves every provider (OpenRouter, Ollama, …), differing only bybaseURL, optional key, and headers.Error isolation —
ask()never throws; failures are encoded in the result. Each round fans out withPromise.allSettled+ per-participant timeout/abort, so one dead participant degrades but never aborts the run. A participant that fails one round is still invited to the next.Always-valid output — the synthesizer is asked for strict JSON, retried once, and finally falls back to a mechanical synthesis so the tool always returns schema-valid structured content.
stdout is sacred — all logging goes to stderr only; stdout carries the MCP JSON-RPC stream.
Available Tools
3 toolsdiscussRun a multi-agent discussionA
Fan out a topic + code context to configured AI participants, run an N-round debate where they critique and refine each other's answers, then return a synthesized, ranked recommendation. Writes a full markdown transcript to disk.
Inputs: topic (required), rounds, context, options, +3 more. Returns: rounds, degraded, consensus, disagreements, +6 more
list_modelsList models available from configured providersA
Query each configured provider (OpenRouter, Ollama, ...) for the model ids it can serve. Useful to discover valid model names before editing the config or choosing participants.
Inputs: provider. Returns: providers
list_participantsList configured discussion participantsA
List the AI participants configured for the ai-discuss server, including type, model, whether they are enabled/available, and which is the default synthesizer. Useful before calling discuss.
Inputs: enabledOnly. Returns: participants, defaultRounds, defaultSynthesizer
Tool Schema Changelog
Recent tool additions, removals, and schema changes observed during successful MCP inspections.
Loading tool schema changelog…
TDQS
Scored across 3 tools
Each tool serves a distinct purpose: discuss runs the debate, list_models discovers available models, and list_participants shows configured participants. No functional overlap.
All tools use consistent snake_case verb_noun naming (discuss, list_models, list_participants), with a clear pattern.
Three tools is well-scoped for this focused server; each tool plays an essential role without redundancy.
Tools cover the main discussion task and listing of resources, but lack create/update/delete operations for participants or models, leaving configuration management to external means.
Maintenance
Related MCP Connectors
Convene a panel of expert AI personas to debate any decision from every side.
Multi-model AI debates: GPT-4o, Claude, Gemini & 200+ models discuss, then synthesize insight.
Join a lab where AI agents from different people debate in turns and refute each other.
Commission a multi-model AI spec committee from your agent; get rubric-scored, build-ready specs.
Related MCP Servers
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceEnables multi-round brainstorming debates between multiple AI models like GPT, DeepSeek, and Ollama to produce synthesized final outputs. Users can orchestrate parallel model interactions where AI agents critique and refine each other's ideas to reach a consolidated conclusion.7111 npm73MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to facilitate structured multi-model debates that synthesize multiple perspectives into clear categories like ground truths and blind spots. It provides tools for running real-time debates, checking model health, and managing history via the Model Context Protocol.28 npm1MIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceFacilitates structured multi-agent debates with arguments, rebuttals, and judgments across multiple rounds, enabling diverse AI personas to engage in formal debate and collaborative problem-solving.120 npm17MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceOrchestrates sequential debates between multiple AI models across four phases (constructive, challenge, closing, synthesis) with host intervention and anti-sycophancy enforcement.-