anime_info

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are present, so the description carries full burden. It only states it returns details and does not add, but lacks disclosure on side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or what 'Medusa presence' entails.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is very concise (one sentence plus negation) and front-loaded with the core purpose. It sacrifices completeness for brevity but remains efficient.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given 7 parameters, no annotations, and an output schema, the description is insufficient. It fails to explain the meaning of 'Medusa presence', the effect of numeric parameters, or the output structure beyond 'compact details'.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, so the description must compensate. It only explains the title and mal_id parameters (2 of 7). The other five parameters (source, limit, min_score, score_gap, max_synopsis_chars) are undocumented.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states it returns compact anime details and Medusa presence by title or MAL ID, and explicitly says it does not add anime, distinguishing it from addition-oriented sibling tools.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies use when you have a title or MAL ID and need details, and clarifies not for adding. However, it does not provide explicit alternatives or when-not-to-use scenarios beyond 'does not add anime.'

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.