snapshot_page

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Despite no annotations, the description discloses key behaviors: creates a snapshot with recursive children, saves to JSON if output_path is provided, and gives a default path. It does not state whether the operation is read-only or describe side effects, but the core functionality is clear.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely concise—three sentences that cover purpose, output format, and default path. Every word adds value without redundancy.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's simplicity and the presence of an output schema (which covers return values), the description is complete. It covers all essential aspects: what it does, what it includes, and how output is handled. Prerequisites like permissions are implied but not critical.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

With 0% schema description coverage, the description fully compensates. It explains that page_id identifies the page and output_path controls where the JSON is saved, including the default path. This adds significant meaning beyond the raw schema types.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states 'Create a complete snapshot of a page with all nested children.' This specifies the exact action (create snapshot) and resource (page with children), distinguishing it from related tools like read_page_deep (read only) and restore_page_from_snapshot (reverse operation).

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description mentions 'suitable for restore,' implying a use case, and the default path provides context. However, it does not explicitly contrast with alternatives like read_page_deep or specify when not to use it, leaving some ambiguity.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.