F
licenseNot graded
qualityC
maintenanceExposes the Mythic C2 framework as an MCP server so LLMs can operate agents, issue tasks, and query platform data conversationally.
-
caldera-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to caldera-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityNot gradedmaintenanceConnects MCP clients to a Kali Linux terminal API, enabling AI-assisted penetration testing, CTF challenge solving, and automated security reconnaissance through command execution.1MIT
- AlicenseCqualityCmaintenanceEnables LLM agents to interact with and automate operations with the AdaptixC2 framework via the MCP protocol.5432GPL 3.0
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceConnects any MCP-compatible AI client to Letta.ai's stateful agents for agent conversations, memory management, and tool orchestration.1812MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol server for orchestrating red team security assessments, enabling LLMs to manage agents, targets, operations, and findings aligned with MITRE ATT&CK framework.MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceProduction-grade MCP server that exposes Kali Linux penetration testing tools to AI agents, enabling automated reconnaissance, web application testing, vulnerability assessment, and more.-
TDQS
A3.9/5.0
Scored across 18 tools
Disambiguation5/5
Every tool targets a distinct resource-action pair (ability, adversary, operation, agent). No two tools have overlapping purposes; even similar verbs like 'get' and 'list' are clearly differentiated by singular vs. plural. An agent can easily select the right tool.
Naming Consistency5/5
All tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern with the server prefix 'caldera_'. The verbs (create, delete, get, list, update, health_check, set) are uniform and predictable. No mixing of styles or ambiguous verbs.
Tool Count4/5
18 tools is slightly above the typical 3-15 well-scoped range, but each tool serves a clear purpose for managing Caldera resources. The count feels justified given the domain (multiple CRUD operations, agent listing, health check, state management) and not excessive.
Completeness4/5
The tool surface covers CRUD for abilities, adversaries, and operations, plus agent querying and state management. Minor gaps exist: no update_ability or update_operation (though update_adversary is present), and no delete_agent. These are not critical but slightly reduce completeness.
Maintenance
ActivityInactive
ResponsivenessNo issues