Skip to main content
Glama

resume_print

Resume a paused 3D print job by setting confirm=true; use when a print is paused and needs to continue.

Instructions

Resume a paused print. Requires confirm=true and a paused job.

Tool call template

This tool declares no required parameters. Add optional parameters from the input schema as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {},
    "name": "resume_print"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
confirmNo
confirm_tokenNo

Output Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No arguments

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. First observedv2.0.1

TDQS

B3.4/5.0
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already disclose a non-read-only, non-destructive mutation, so the bar is lower. The description adds that a paused job is required and that confirm=true is needed, which is helpful behavior beyond the annotations, but it omits what happens if the job is not paused, and never mentions confirm_token at all.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two short sentences, precondition front-loaded, zero filler. Nothing could be trimmed without losing meaning.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

An output schema exists, so return values need not be described, and the description covers the essential precondition and one parameter. The unaddressed confirm_token is the one remaining gap for a tool this simple.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters2/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, so the description must carry parameter meaning. It explains confirm=true (and implicitly that the default false will not work) but leaves confirm_token entirely unexplained, which is the more obscure of the two parameters.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description names a specific verb and resource ('Resume a paused print') and implicitly pairs with the sibling pause_print. It does not explicitly name the sibling or distinguish itself from resume_after_power_loss, so it falls short of a 5.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

It states a real precondition ('a paused job'), which is useful routing context, but gives no explicit when-not guidance or pointer to alternatives such as resume_after_power_loss or start_print. Usage is implied rather than fully instructed.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Deploy Server

Other Tools