No user-submitted related servers found.
Scored across 11 tools
Most tools target clearly distinct resources and actions (intents vs invoices vs details vs quotes vs metrics vs conversions). The one real overlap is get_invoices and get_invoices_formatted, which return the same underlying invoice data with different formatting, so an agent could reasonably pick the wrong one. This is a minor boundary issue rather than widespread duplication.
Names follow a consistent snake_case get_/convert_ verb_noun pattern (get_intent_details, get_invoice_details, convert_chain_id_to_name). The only slight deviation is get_invoices_formatted using an adjective modifier rather than a plain noun, but the convention is still readable and predictable.
Eleven tools is well within the ideal 3-15 range and each maps to a distinct read/analytics or helper operation. The surface feels scoped to the Everclear domain without obvious filler.
The server covers the read/analytics lifecycle well: intents, invoices, invoice details, minimum amounts, route quotes, and liquidity/clearing metrics, plus conversion helpers. There are no write operations (submit intent, settle invoice), but as a monitoring/query surface the coverage is solid with only minor gaps.