No user-submitted related servers found.
Scored across 22 tools
Tools are mostly distinct: schema, document CRUD, query execution, and query analysis are clearly separated. A few overlaps exist: get_cluster_health_and_services vs get_cluster_diagnostics_report both check connectivity but explicitly differentiate active vs passive checks, and the get_queries_* tools are all similar but each targets a specific metric (selectivity, covering index, primary index, result count, etc.). Still, the descriptions are thorough enough to guide selection.
Most tools follow a verb_noun pattern: get_schema_for_collection, get_document_by_id, lookup_subdocument, run_sql_plus_plus_query, test_cluster_connection. However, there are deviations: get_queries_not_selective and get_longest_running_queries are more adjective-based, and 'lookup_subdocument' uses 'lookup' instead of 'get'. Despite mixed verb choices (get, lookup, run, test), the pattern is clear and predictable.
With 22 tools, the server is on the higher end but still well-scoped for a comprehensive Couchbase interaction layer covering schema, documents, querying, cluster health, and query analysis. The count is justified by the breadth of features (e.g., 7 query-analysis tools). It feels slightly heavy but not excessive.
The server provides read operations for documents (get, lookup subdocument) but lacks create, update, and delete for documents. It also lacks bucket/scope/collection management (create/drop). Query analysis is thorough with index advisor and health metrics. The gap in write operations is notable and will force agents to rely on raw SQL++ for mutations, which is a significant omission.