Skip to main content
Glama

Delete membership question

delete_membership_question
Destructive

Remove a membership question from a Skool group by question number; remaining questions shift up and the updated list is returned. Admin-only.

Instructions

Remove a membership question. Admins only.

Removes one membership question; the ones after it move up a number. Returns the questions left. Admins only. Runs without asking first: nobody is notified.

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
groupYesGroup URL name, e.g. 'yourgroup' for skool.com/yourgroup.
numberYesQuestion number, from add_membership_question or get_group.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. First observedv0.1.0

TDQS

A3.6/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already flag destructiveHint=true and idempotentHint=false, and the description adds genuinely new behavioral facts: subsequent questions shift up a number, the remaining questions are returned, and the call executes without confirmation or notification. That is real side-effect disclosure beyond the annotation block.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness3/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Front-loaded with the action, which is good, but 'Admins only' appears twice and 'Remove a membership question' is restated as 'Removes one membership question' — roughly a third of the text is redundant.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With no output schema, the description usefully states that the remaining questions are returned, so an agent knows what comes back. Combined with the destructive/renumbering warnings, the definition covers what an agent needs to call it safely.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% and both parameters carry descriptive text (including the 'from add_membership_question or get_group' provenance hint). The description adds only the implication that 'number' is a positional index affected by renumbering, so it does not exceed the schema meaningfully.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb and resource ('Remove a membership question'), which distinguishes it cleanly from add_membership_question and update_membership_question in the sibling list. It doesn't name those siblings explicitly, but the operation is unambiguous.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

'Admins only' gives the key prerequisite, but there is no guidance on when to delete versus update a question, or what to do if the number is out of range. Usage is implied rather than spelled out.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.