Skip to main content
Glama
PeoplePerHour MCP Server

PeoplePerHour MCP Server

Related Servers

Alternatives to PeoplePerHour MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables searching Upwork jobs with real search filters like competition, verified payment, and budget/rate floors, and reading your profile, connects, proposals, and messages through a Chrome session. Also offers untested tools for managing proposals, messages, and contracts.
      18
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to search freelance projects, submit and edit bids, read and reply to employer messages, and update a freelancer profile through an unofficial integration.
      36
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables read-only searching and evaluating public freelance projects, including detailed views, opportunity scoring, and best-opportunity lists based on user skills.
      4
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.9/5.0

    Scored across 17 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a distinct resource and action: search_* for discovery, get_* for single-resource detail, list_* for account-scoped collections, and paired watch/unwatch and save/delete_saved_search verbs. The only near-pair, list_watchlist vs search_projects, is clearly differentiated by scope and the description notes they share a shape without being confusable.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    Every tool follows consistent snake_case verb_noun form (get_project, search_offers, list_saved_searches, delete_saved_search). Opposing operations use symmetric prefixes (watch_project/unwatch_project) and related verbs (search vs get vs list) are used meaningfully throughout.

    Tool Count4/5

    17 tools is slightly above the ideal 3–15 range but each maps to a real, non-redundant operation across several domains (projects, offers, freelancers, account, watchlist, saved searches, notifications, WorkStreams). Nothing feels padded, though the surface is on the heavy side.

    Completeness3/5

    Discovery and read coverage is thorough (search/get for projects, offers, freelancers; account, watchlist, saved searches, notifications, WorkStreams), but the surface is essentially read-only with notable gaps: no proposal submission, no message replies, no project creation for buyers, and no marking notifications read. Some of these are explicitly out of scope by design, which limits agent end-to-end workflows.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo recent community issues